Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 40
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Finance committee  Yes, when it comes to the proposed section 181 regulation-making authority, which the amendment speaks to, if the regulations were to be made and that authority were to be exercised through a process that would involve meaningful consultation with all stakeholders, it would allow

November 20th, 2018Committee meeting

Lori Straznicky

Finance committee  In the federal jurisdiction, there are some employers who would have a certain portion of their workforce who would be under federal jurisdiction and another portion could be under provincial jurisdiction. It would give the Governor in Council the flexibility to allow for one reg

November 20th, 2018Committee meeting

Lori Straznicky

Finance committee  That would make sense, yes.

November 20th, 2018Committee meeting

Lori Straznicky

Finance committee  Again, going back to how the regulations would be made, they would be made in a way that would have extensive and meaningful consultation on how it would be used. Certainly any regulations that would be brought in would ensure that employees were covered under a provincial legisl

November 20th, 2018Committee meeting

Lori Straznicky

Finance committee  Mr. Chair, I may invite a colleague from the Treasury Board Secretariat to take that question.

November 20th, 2018Committee meeting

Lori Straznicky

Finance committee  I won't comment on whether it would bring forth more complaints to the courts. What I would say is that it is not transferring an entire plan or taking away an employer's obligation to conduct certain steps in the exercise. It is confined to certain criteria related to a system t

November 20th, 2018Committee meeting

Lori Straznicky

Finance committee  I would say that, if in those public sector workplaces where there has been a universal classification system like this provision contemplates, so long as it has met two requirements, that it's assessing the skills, effort, responsibility and working conditions and that it's been

November 20th, 2018Committee meeting

Lori Straznicky

Finance committee  Yes. In terms of the difference between possession and control, the way that possession is used here, employers must provide information in their possession. This creates an objective standard that allows for employers to assess what material they would be required to provide to

November 20th, 2018Committee meeting

Lori Straznicky

November 20th, 2018Committee meeting

Lori Straznicky

November 20th, 2018Committee meeting

Lori Straznicky

November 20th, 2018Committee meeting

Lori Straznicky

Finance committee  The provision right now requires that employee representatives on a committee have to decide amongst themselves unanimously before they can put forward a vote. The purpose of the section would be to ensure that smaller bargaining agents who would represent employees within that w

November 20th, 2018Committee meeting

Lori Straznicky

Finance committee  The dispute resolution process would apply within the pay equity committee structure. The employee and the employer representatives on the committee would have dispute resolution available between them.

November 20th, 2018Committee meeting

Lori Straznicky

Finance committee  Yes, it is.

November 20th, 2018Committee meeting

Lori Straznicky

Finance committee  Is the question on how I interpret proposed subsection 20(1)?

November 20th, 2018Committee meeting

Lori Straznicky