Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 541-555 of 618
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Procedure and House Affairs committee  It does say, “the message was necessary for the health and safety of Canadians.” Does something like CRA affect the health and safety of Canadians? I would say no.... That's right; I have seen people die from heart attacks from tax evasion.

October 15th, 2018Committee meeting

Stephanie Kusie

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I don't know. Perhaps we need an amendment to the amendment, indicating.... I feel as though this amendment provides for the fairness of putting the government on a level playing field with third parties and registered parties. I do agree with Mr. de Burgh Graham that certainly

October 15th, 2018Committee meeting

Stephanie Kusie

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Sure. It is in coordination with my question to the minister during her appearance here today about the government at present enjoying specific advantages in regard to being the government. What this attempts to do is level the playing field for the other registered parties in te

October 15th, 2018Committee meeting

Stephanie Kusie

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Pardon me; before we go to the vote, is this what she committed to within the discussion just now, when I asked her, “Will you commit to not...”, in your opinion? So, no.

October 15th, 2018Committee meeting

Stephanie Kusie

Procedure and House Affairs committee  In CPC-9950080, we are proposing that—

October 15th, 2018Committee meeting

Stephanie Kusie

October 15th, 2018Committee meeting

Stephanie Kusie

Procedure and House Affairs committee  This is a new one, because I believe now that PV-1 has been defeated, the other is moot.

October 15th, 2018Committee meeting

Stephanie Kusie

October 15th, 2018Committee meeting

Stephanie Kusie

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Okay, well, I think it's obvious in here: “future elector means a Canadian citizen who is 16 years”.

October 15th, 2018Committee meeting

Stephanie Kusie

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Apparently the reason for this amendment is concern that there will not be the ability to identify the numeric outcomes at one polling station, whereas the existing system ensures that there is the ability to determine the number coming from one specific polling station.

October 15th, 2018Committee meeting

Stephanie Kusie

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Mr. Chair, pardon me; before we begin, I had a point of order, please.

October 15th, 2018Committee meeting

Stephanie Kusie

Procedure and House Affairs committee  My apologies, and my apologies to you, Ms. May. Before we begin our extensive clause-by-clause consideration of Bill C-76, I want to give the courtesy of a heads-up to my colleagues about some additional Conservative amendments. There are approximately 21 amendments that were d

October 15th, 2018Committee meeting

Stephanie Kusie

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I tried to be more expressive than Bardish. That's a joke.

October 15th, 2018Committee meeting

Stephanie Kusie

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Yes. The first amendment will be moved before amendment PV-1. The first amendment, entitled CPC-10008563, is: That Bill C-76, in Clause 2, be amended by adding after line 25 on page 2 the following: (e.1) the ballot reconciliation reports prepared under section 283.1;

October 15th, 2018Committee meeting

Stephanie Kusie

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Sure. It relates to the inverted polling division/polling station relationship, and adds a ballot reconciliation requirement where multiple polls are at one polling station.

October 15th, 2018Committee meeting

Stephanie Kusie