Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-5 of 5

Justice committee  The plan has been in place since 1998.

November 19th, 2018Committee meeting

Valérie Laberge

Justice committee  There are two parts to that question. First, in subsection 16(3), the factors to be considered are listed. Paragraph 16(3)(a) specifically refers to: “the child’s needs, given the child’s age and stage of development, such as the child’s need for stability.” In our opinion, that

November 19th, 2018Committee meeting

Valérie Laberge

Justice committee  Can you repeat the question? I want to make sure I fully understood.

November 19th, 2018Committee meeting

Valérie Laberge

Justice committee  We share our colleague's opinion. Courts do not always consider it in their decisions. Courts will tackle the question anyway, often obliquely or indirectly. In my opinion, which I feel is also the opinion of the Barreau du Québec, it is preferable to say that the circumstances w

November 19th, 2018Committee meeting

Valérie Laberge

Justice committee  Good afternoon. Another aspect that seems problematic to us is that several of the provisions, including clauses 16.1 and 16.2, are considerably unclear in our opinion. For example, subclause (9) of clause 16.1, which deals with parenting orders, prohibits the removal of a child

November 19th, 2018Committee meeting

Valérie Laberge