Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 18
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Transport committee  The recommendation that addresses that directly is that if we want to make good choices, we need to have the information necessary to make those choices.

November 29th, 2018Committee meeting

David Kaiser

Transport committee  I'll give two parts in response. One is from a public health perspective. Our goal is to reduce risk to as close to zero as we can. It was mentioned before that there are many other sources of noise. We have to take all of them into account. The objective should be to reduce expo

November 29th, 2018Committee meeting

David Kaiser

Transport committee  That's the burning question. Instead, I would tell you that we have made a lot of progress in Quebec over the past three to five years. For example, there is ongoing work to adopt a provincial noise policy, which is in part a result of work undertaken in Montreal 10 years ago.

November 29th, 2018Committee meeting

David Kaiser

Transport committee  It's a very complex issue. I can answer that this is the case in general, but not for this specific issue at the moment. I will be very honest about this. With regard to environmental and transportation noise in a city like Montreal, it is clear that the most disadvantaged peopl

November 29th, 2018Committee meeting

David Kaiser

Transport committee  It can be either, but I'm a doctor.

November 29th, 2018Committee meeting

David Kaiser

Transport committee  From a scientific perspective, definitely, but we also have to think about what can actually be done. I think overall exposure to noise and daytime exposure to noise are maybe more in the domain of urban planning, zoning, sound insulation, and making sure that we don't expose mo

November 29th, 2018Committee meeting

David Kaiser

November 29th, 2018Committee meeting

David Kaiser

Transport committee  I will give you the same answer: this need is real. If Transport Canada is the authority, that's fine, but then it's about bringing the right people to the table and aiming for a more permanent structure and policies to control noise.

November 29th, 2018Committee meeting

David Kaiser

Transport committee  Yes. Absolutely.

November 29th, 2018Committee meeting

David Kaiser

Transport committee  That's a very good question. Of course we want to know more and better document the problem. Let me come back to what I said earlier: noise is harmful to health, and we have already gathered very good evidence on this subject. In Montreal, we are one step ahead of several other

November 29th, 2018Committee meeting

David Kaiser

Transport committee  Yes, I'll send you all the scientific articles we have, as well as the notices mentioned earlier.

November 29th, 2018Committee meeting

David Kaiser

Transport committee  This committee was set up when the public health branch began working on noise issues related to the airport. At the moment, in Montreal, there is no functional committee made up of all the stakeholders in the field.

November 29th, 2018Committee meeting

David Kaiser

Transport committee  There were some at the beginning, and the public health branch was also present. It should be noted that Aéroports de Montréal has legal obligations in this regard and that the company has formed its own committee. There is no longer an intersectoral committee like the one establ

November 29th, 2018Committee meeting

David Kaiser

Transport committee  Yes. In fact, it no longer exists in this format.

November 29th, 2018Committee meeting

David Kaiser

Transport committee  In terms of noise standards, there is already a very good starting point, which is the WHO guidelines. They were just renewed, and they are based on the best available evidence. We know what we should be aiming for; we have that information. The recommendation for aircraft noise

November 29th, 2018Committee meeting

David Kaiser