Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-45 of 72
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Finance committee  Yes, I think we should be looking at our own domestic procurement policy as a starting point to show how it can be done and to show how it's supportive of lower-carbon-footprint steel in our marketplace. Then we can pursue discussions with others—that's fine—but I think we should

February 3rd, 2020Committee meeting

Catherine Cobden

Finance committee  The removal of the tariffs was a very important step for the Canadian steel industry, as you can well appreciate. They really eroded our competitive position. As I mentioned already, that saw a lack of investments coming into the industry. Now that they've been removed, we've a

February 3rd, 2020Committee meeting

Catherine Cobden

Finance committee  Well, I've mentioned the trade remedies, and I'm going to say that they will continue to always be there, given the situation. Then I also talked about—and I hope you took note of it—our interest in generating solutions to reduce our carbon footprint. We are a large emitter, but

February 3rd, 2020Committee meeting

Catherine Cobden

Finance committee  Yes, I must say that we are very happy with the outcome of the CUSMA, with what it looks like. In fact, I've been on the public record on several occasions now to say that the Canadian Steel Producers urge the swift passage of CUSMA. It is a very good deal for the steel sector. I

February 3rd, 2020Committee meeting

Catherine Cobden

Finance committee  Actually, we feel that CUSMA very much strengthens the North American content requirements both in the rules of origin and in the subsequent down-the-road additional criteria in seven years time, specific to auto. From our perspective, this really does strengthen the competitiven

February 3rd, 2020Committee meeting

Catherine Cobden

Finance committee  Just to clarify my comments, we are going to see large emitters pay about $200 million per year into the industrial component of the program. There's been some discussion already on revenue recycling, that it should go to the province from which it came and all of that. That's fi

February 3rd, 2020Committee meeting

Catherine Cobden

Finance committee  We operate in the world of what we have. What we have is a system, a regulatory system, that we need to meet. Basically, we do not see our competitors having to meet that system. So we are very concerned about leakage—

February 3rd, 2020Committee meeting

Catherine Cobden

Finance committee  —and we think there could be solutions for leakage. We're not necessarily saying that we need to tax them on their way in. We need to look at ways, though, that support the domestic industry's carbon objectives without having those unintended consequences—

February 3rd, 2020Committee meeting

Catherine Cobden

Finance committee  —that you've identified in your question.

February 3rd, 2020Committee meeting

Catherine Cobden

February 3rd, 2020Committee meeting

Catherine Cobden

Finance committee  Yes. The facts we can talk about specifically are the transportation costs. Of course, to your earlier comment, our industry is also in a regulatory framework that has seen us improve our emission portfolio and our emission profile. But on a transportation level alone, we would h

February 3rd, 2020Committee meeting

Catherine Cobden

Finance committee  Yes. I think that it's—

February 3rd, 2020Committee meeting

Catherine Cobden

Finance committee  We're seeing the investment community as well ask questions about the carbon performance of our industries. By the way, I don't think this is limited to any one industry.

February 3rd, 2020Committee meeting

Catherine Cobden

Finance committee  I think this is a shift that's been taking place.

February 3rd, 2020Committee meeting

Catherine Cobden

Finance committee  Oh, you did?

February 3rd, 2020Committee meeting

Catherine Cobden