Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Transport committee I think I have it. It would read, once amended, “(10) Any exemption granted under subsection (1) or (2) shall be published on the Transport Canada website and by any other means that the Minister considers appropriate within 30 days after it comes into force.”
November 20th, 2023Committee meeting
Philippe Méla
Citizenship and Immigration committee Mrs. Lalonde, in the wording of the subamendment, you replaced all the text in section 4, meaning 7.1a), b) and c), with the text you proposed, which is 7.1a) and b). So, subsection c) would disappear. Did you want to keep subsection c) or not?
May 15th, 2023Committee meeting
Philippe Méla
Public Safety committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. I just made a few changes that Ms. Damoff is aware of. The amendment would read, in English: protection order has the meaning assigned by the regulations —I removed the semicolon and “ordonnance de protection” because it's already at the end— but is i
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Philippe Méla
Public Safety committee Did you remove the term “court”?
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Philippe Méla
Public Safety committee I don't have that.
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Philippe Méla
Public Safety committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. There are other corrections that need to be made to the French version of Mr. Julian's amendment. In the segment that reads "L'autorisation de port prévues," there should not be an "s" on the word "prévues". In the word "établit," the "t" should be replace
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Philippe Méla
Public Safety committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. Yes, I can try to do that. We have to remember that when amendments are drafted by the Department of Justice it is done independently by anglophone and francophone drafters. It isn't a matter of translating from one language to the other; it is parallel dr
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Philippe Méla
Public Safety committee Mr. Chair, the change is only in the English version. Of course, on the French side you'll have the new English version. It says both “if the justice is satisfied” and “where the justice is satisfied”, so at reprint there will be a problem. We won't know which one to put there.
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Philippe Méla
Public Safety committee No, it's not.
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Philippe Méla
Public Safety committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. As you will recall, yesterday the committee adopted a subamendment to NDP-1, the protection order. There was a new definition. In French, in the definition of protection order, "S'entend une ordonnance rendue" should read "S'entend d'une ordonnance rendue.
May 11th, 2023Committee meeting
Philippe Méla
Environment committee No, we don't know where you are.
March 9th, 2023Committee meeting
Philippe Méla
Environment committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. Madame Pauzé had proposed an amendment earlier on page 15, line 29, that replaced the words, in English, “may specify” with the word “specifies”. That was right in the middle of the amendment that was proposed by the government, so it would preclude the ame
February 2nd, 2023Committee meeting
Philippe Méla
Environment committee They are, unless you want them removed.
February 2nd, 2023Committee meeting
Philippe Méla
Environment committee I'm not sure because the amendment proposed by the government doesn't address what's in the amendment. It looks more like an amendment rather than a subamendment. It would probably be easier to deal with amendment, NDP-18, first. If you wanted to propose your new amendment, as I
February 2nd, 2023Committee meeting
Philippe Méla
Environment committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'm going to try to explain what the government amendment and the NDP amendment do at the same time. I would propose different writing for those, so that it reads like this, since it's a subamendment. It is that the amendment be amended by, (a) adding on
February 2nd, 2023Committee meeting
Philippe Méla