Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Justice committee I agree on that point. Pardon me if I said it that way. It may give the court an additional tool. If the person is found guilty under the suggested section 253.1, he or she will be prohibited from driving. I did not express myself properly. The police officer roadside is not the
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Greg Yost
Justice committee Cannabis is listed in Schedule II.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Greg Yost
Justice committee Nowhere.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Greg Yost
Justice committee There is none.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Greg Yost
Justice committee Yes.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Greg Yost
Justice committee I would just add that in the case of cannabis, the lawful excuse offence would apply to a person who has received permission to possess cannabis for medical reasons. In that case, for all practical purposes it is a medication.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Greg Yost
Justice committee First of all, in the part of this bill that has to do with drugs, the provision is nearly exactly the same as the one passed by the committee during the last Parliament. This new offence, which would apply in the case of all drugs, was added by the Standing Committee on Justice,
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Greg Yost
Justice committee Currently, if a police officer finds drugs in your possession that are listed in Schedule I, II or III, obviously he can lay criminal charges against you. It is enforcement of the law.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Greg Yost
Justice committee There are a couple of slight exceptions to that, the most important of which would be that the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act does not provide for the summary conviction offence with respect to under 30 grams of marijuana. That is not one that would be punished in the same w
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Greg Yost
Justice committee Yes. Possession of schedule I, II and III drugs is an offence under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. The level of penalties varies.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Greg Yost
Justice committee The only other thing, of course, is that if you're transporting enough, you're going to be into a charge of trafficking under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, which is much more serious than this. If this were adopted, there would be a variety of tools the police officer
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Greg Yost
Justice committee That is correct.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Greg Yost
Justice committee You said that even people who have taken medication could be jailed. Normally, a person in that situation would, I believe, have what we call a lawful excuse.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Greg Yost
Justice committee Consequently, there is no problem with medication. When we looked at this clause again, we realized that it was the same provision as the one passed by the standing committee in the last Parliament. When we added the prohibition against driving, we didn't think of the effect it w
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Greg Yost
Justice committee We have Corporal Graham here, who runs the program for the RCMP, and he was the one who said we would be light years ahead of other countries. I'm certainly not an expert on how they have done this in the 46 U.S. states that have brought this together. Their constitutional arrang
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Greg Yost