Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Environment committee That's only to the extent that they've been firmed up with policies that actually are going to be effective, so it's not enough for the Government of Ontario to say that it's going to set some targets; what we really need are some specific policies. Where those exist--such as Hyd
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Mark Jaccard
Environment committee Very much so.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Mark Jaccard
Environment committee Unfortunately, the answer is no. So far the Europeans, on a policy design basis, have done better than we have in Canada in implementing policies that have a better chance of reducing emissions, but the models they use are still, in my view, overstating their ability to achieve t
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Mark Jaccard
Environment committee Yes, we have those.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Mark Jaccard
Environment committee For example, the rate of use of transit for commuting increases, and that's a little bit because of the effect of the Conservative transit pass tax credit, but it's especially because of investment in improved transit, some of it funded by both provincial and federal governments.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Mark Jaccard
Environment committee Yes, it is.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Mark Jaccard
Environment committee Yes, it is.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Mark Jaccard
Environment committee The oil sands producer could decide to do nothing different from business as usual in their own plant or activity in terms of reducing emissions and instead subsidize. In other words, instead of government subsidizing, the oil sands producer would subsidize reduction actions by o
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Mark Jaccard
Environment committee It's mostly a transfer of funds to transit users. Universally, research shows that only a tiny percent of automobile commuters would be motivated to switch to transit by that tax credit. Therefore at least the taxpayer cost per tonne of CO2 reduced is, we think, well above $1,000
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Mark Jaccard
Environment committee Yes, and my apologies. I was completely unaware of what the topic was. I just knew you wanted to hear me as a committee. So am I permitted to talk about--
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Mark Jaccard
Environment committee I'm almost finished here. What I would say, with respect to the G8 discussion and the previous speaker and other discussions, is that what I'm hearing is that this is a first in the sense of having the United States and other major countries agree that we need a global agreement
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Mark Jaccard
Environment committee I'm still here, if you can hear me.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Mark Jaccard
Environment committee That's correct.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Mark Jaccard
Environment committee Yes, thank you. Hello, everyone. I'll keep it quite short so we can better have time for questions, and I'll also try to be very brief in my answers to questions. I released a report with the C.D. Howe Institute, as I think everyone's aware, a week or so ago. That was somethi
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Mark Jaccard
Environment committee I'm here now.
June 19th, 2007Committee meeting
Professor Mark Jaccard