Evidence of meeting #25 for Agriculture and Agri-Food in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was inspectors.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Evan Fraser  Associate Professor, Canada Research Chair, Department of Geography, University of Guelph, As an Individual
John Cranfield  Member, Management Team, Consumer and Market Demand Network
Bob Kingston  National President, Agriculture Union
Carla Ventin  Vice-President, Federal Government Affairs, Food and Consumer Products of Canada

4:40 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Storseth Conservative Westlock—St. Paul, AB

Can you give me a number?

4:40 p.m.

National President, Agriculture Union

Bob Kingston

No, I can't in dairy. I'd have to go and get that for you. That's why I said it's an across-the-board figure.

4:40 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Storseth Conservative Westlock—St. Paul, AB

Could you submit those numbers to the committee in writing? I understand if you don't have them, but--

4:40 p.m.

National President, Agriculture Union

Bob Kingston

Sure, absolutely.

In addition, I would tell you that 2% is high, because 2% of shipments are looked at, and within those shipments you're also looking at a small amount.

4:40 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Storseth Conservative Westlock—St. Paul, AB

So vegetables, produce, 2%...?

4:40 p.m.

National President, Agriculture Union

4:40 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Storseth Conservative Westlock—St. Paul, AB

But for meat, you're saying it would be higher--like 50%?

4:40 p.m.

National President, Agriculture Union

Bob Kingston

When it comes in.

4:40 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Storseth Conservative Westlock—St. Paul, AB

How much of that would be inspected on the other side of the border by the Americans?

4:40 p.m.

National President, Agriculture Union

Bob Kingston

One hundred percent.

4:40 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Storseth Conservative Westlock—St. Paul, AB

One hundred percent. So it's inspected by the Americans, but not necessarily inspected by Canadians?

4:40 p.m.

National President, Agriculture Union

Bob Kingston

Correct. The same with produce and grains that are sent elsewhere.

4:45 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Storseth Conservative Westlock—St. Paul, AB

Isn't that kind of what you were talking about on the other side of it? You were saying that we inspect 100% of what we send out, but it's not necessarily 100% being inspected in, say, China, when it gets there from Canadian exports.

4:45 p.m.

National President, Agriculture Union

Bob Kingston

We're required to document that we have inspected, and we certify products leaving the country as meeting the standards of the foreign country, so in terms of diseases--

4:45 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Storseth Conservative Westlock—St. Paul, AB

What I'm trying to get to is you said there are two sets of rules. What you're saying is the Americans would inspect everything that comes across into Canada, and we would inspect a lesser number. Now, we inspect everything that goes into the U.S. Would the U.S. inspect everything that comes into the U.S.?

4:45 p.m.

National President, Agriculture Union

Bob Kingston

They certify everything that comes to Canada. We certify everything that goes out. It's what happens when you inspect imports on behalf of the country that's receiving them.

One of the things you have to recognize is when you inspect a product going out, you inspect it at source, you inspect the product itself, and then it gets loaded on.... This has happened frequently--a shipment of meat is surrounded by car batteries, and that's intercepted at the border when we do import inspections. They're talking about taking those inspections off the table right now.

4:45 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Storseth Conservative Westlock—St. Paul, AB

The last question I have for you--and I thank you for your testimony--you've made it very clear that the union that you represent firmly believes that more inspectors equals a safer system for Canadians. Correct?

4:45 p.m.

National President, Agriculture Union

4:45 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Storseth Conservative Westlock—St. Paul, AB

But this is a time of austerity, and everybody's looking at what they can do to help out the greater good. Would you, today, be willing to say that you and your union would be willing to agree to wage freezes if it meant more inspectors?

4:45 p.m.

Liberal

Frank Valeriote Liberal Guelph, ON

Mr. Chair, that's a highly inappropriate question. We're talking about marketing, we're talking about inspections--

4:45 p.m.

National President, Agriculture Union

Bob Kingston

If you want to get into a debate about the economy in general and where the money comes from, sure.

4:45 p.m.

Liberal

Frank Valeriote Liberal Guelph, ON

--and now he's talking about wages. It's an inappropriate question.

4:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Larry Miller

Order, order. He can answer the question. He has that choice. I don't think he needs you or me to protect him.

Mr. Storseth, you're out of time. If you want to answer it, Mr. Kingston....

4:45 p.m.

National President, Agriculture Union

Bob Kingston

I appreciate your concern, but it would take a more wholesome look at the entire economic picture, and I'd be glad to do that with you.

4:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Larry Miller

Thank you.

Mr. Allen, you have five minutes.