Evidence of meeting #23 for Fisheries and Oceans in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was nasco.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Guy Beaupré  Director General, Aquaculture Management Directorate, Department of Fisheries and Oceans
James Smith  Director, Certification and Sustainability Policy, Aquaculture Management Directorate, Department of Fisheries and Oceans
Jay Parsons  Director, Aquaculture Science Branch, Department of Fisheries and Oceans
Alistair Struthers  Team Leader, Innovation, Aquaculture Management Directorate, Department of Fisheries and Oceans

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Allen Conservative Tobique—Mactaquac, NB

Thank you. I think my time is up.

4:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

Thank you, Mr. Allen.

Mr. MacAulay.

4:10 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.

Welcome, gentlemen.

I understand that last month the minister announced $800,000 for the Namgis First Nation's closed containment. Can you give me an update on that facility and what the status is right now and what the funding would be used for in this project? To follow on the previous question, should there be more of this or less of this?

4:10 p.m.

Director General, Aquaculture Management Directorate, Department of Fisheries and Oceans

Guy Beaupré

I'll ask Alistair to provide you with the details on the $800,000 for the Namgis First Nation.

4:10 p.m.

Alistair Struthers Team Leader, Innovation, Aquaculture Management Directorate, Department of Fisheries and Oceans

I don't have a specific update as to exactly where they are, but I believe the vast majority of the funding is being used to purchase capital equipment--tanks, water filtration systems, and that type of equipment.

4:10 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

Would the investment be to find new information, or is it more of an investment in making work?

4:15 p.m.

Team Leader, Innovation, Aquaculture Management Directorate, Department of Fisheries and Oceans

Alistair Struthers

It's not so much a make-work project; it is very much a pilot-scale facility to test the pre-commercial scale of Atlatic salmon production.

4:15 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

So this will be different from other projects that you have funded previously.

4:15 p.m.

Team Leader, Innovation, Aquaculture Management Directorate, Department of Fisheries and Oceans

Alistair Struthers

Yes, and it would certainly be the largest type of project that we have funded along those lines. There are a number of other contributing partners as well; it's not just DFO.

4:15 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

Mr. Struthers, what is being focused on in terms of innovation in your department right now? How will these projects affect the future of salmon farming? Is innovation in this area more the duty of the government or the private sector, or both? How do you see it?

4:15 p.m.

Team Leader, Innovation, Aquaculture Management Directorate, Department of Fisheries and Oceans

Alistair Struthers

I think it's actually a duty of both the sectors. It's a duty of the government to help innovation. Certainly from DFO's perspective with the aquaculture innovation program, the focus of that has really been to encourage pre-commercial-scale development of different technologies. It's helping industry adopt those technologies.

There are a whole host of innovative techniques or innovative projects the department is helping or contributing to. We have closed containment, but we are also looking at the whole spectrum of sustainable aquaculture production, from cage-based culture to shellfish culture as well.

4:15 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

It seems to me there is a fair difference.... It looks as though fish has to be more expensive before it's profitable. Are you striving for technology that would finish the fish more quickly? Is there a possibility that this can happen more quickly or more efficiently in closed containment than it can in the open-net concept? What are we doing? Or does it just have to be a more expensive fish in order to make--

4:15 p.m.

Team Leader, Innovation, Aquaculture Management Directorate, Department of Fisheries and Oceans

Alistair Struthers

No. That's one of the premises behind closed containment, that it can shorten the grow-out cycle of the fish.

4:15 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

Does it?

4:15 p.m.

Team Leader, Innovation, Aquaculture Management Directorate, Department of Fisheries and Oceans

Alistair Struthers

That is one of the goals of this project with the Namgis First Nation. In theory, it should, but it's never been demonstrated in real, commercial-scale production. That's the whole goal of this project.

4:15 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

Does the density have a major effect? Can you comment on that?

4:15 p.m.

Team Leader, Innovation, Aquaculture Management Directorate, Department of Fisheries and Oceans

Alistair Struthers

The density is higher. The density is approximately--

4:15 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

No, but does more and more density affect the growth a lot, or is there a point where it does affect the growth?

4:15 p.m.

Team Leader, Innovation, Aquaculture Management Directorate, Department of Fisheries and Oceans

Alistair Struthers

At the projected densities they're looking at, it shouldn't affect the growth. We're looking at approximately three times the density of open-net pens. With any growth trials we've seen for fish at 15 kilograms per cubic metre versus 50 kilograms per cubic metre, the growth is approximately the same.

The biggest controlling factor there is a stable year-round temperature.

4:15 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

In fact you're telling me you can produce three times the amount of fish in the closed containment that you can in the open net.

4:15 p.m.

Team Leader, Innovation, Aquaculture Management Directorate, Department of Fisheries and Oceans

Alistair Struthers

Within that cubic metre of water, yes, we can. The reason they're striving for increased density is to be able to take advantage of the increased cost of the capital assets. As you know from previous testimony at this committee, the costs for a closed-containment system versus a net-pen system are significantly different. You're looking at--

4:15 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

It's more expensive?

4:15 p.m.

Team Leader, Innovation, Aquaculture Management Directorate, Department of Fisheries and Oceans

Alistair Struthers

--about seven and a half times.

4:15 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

Of course we have to have the technology, because Chile and other countries have it, and if something happens, we have to know what we're doing if we're going into this area. Would that be one of the reasons for putting a lot of money into this?

4:15 p.m.

Team Leader, Innovation, Aquaculture Management Directorate, Department of Fisheries and Oceans

Alistair Struthers

It's certainly one of the reasons. Canada, in my opinion, is a world leader in the use of closed-containment technology, certainly from the perspective of recirculating systems for juvenile production. That's the hatch reproduction.

Now we're being asked to look at how this technology would be applied for the entire grow-out cycle, and that is the big question. It has never been done. Well, it's never been done successfully. It's been attempted numerous times, and there have been a number of financial failures.