Evidence of meeting #86 for Health in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was diseases.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Allan Micheil Innes  National Coordinator, Orphanet Canada
Jacquie Micallef  Manager, Member Relations, Policy & Partnerships, Neurological Health Charities Canada

4:55 p.m.

Liberal

Hedy Fry Liberal Vancouver Centre, BC

I think families will make their own personal decisions. But I'm wondering, could the state suddenly say “My gosh, this person is going to be a serious serial murderer and we don't want this child...? I mean, there are things where states can do that. We've seen that happen.

4:55 p.m.

National Coordinator, Orphanet Canada

Dr. Allan Micheil Innes

Well, yeah.... The history is there in many jurisdictions, including my own province, so you're right. I guess I would have to reflect back and look at my colleagues who are in government and hope that's not the case. I guess it's a theoretical fear. I don't see that coming. I think these are always going to be decisions between parents and their doctors.

I will add that this technology will advance, and the ability to test pregnancies in different ways will come, and it will come in the U.S. Again, I think it's simply a matter we should think about at a legislative level and a thoughtful level.

5 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joy Smith

Dr. Innes, thank you very much.

That was, indeed, a very insightful question and an important one.

I want to thank Ms. Micallef and Dr. Innes for coming today and contributing very much to our technological innovation study.

I want to thank the committee members as well. I understand the bells are going to ring at 5:15 p.m.

The meeting is adjourned.