Thank you, Madam Chair and committee members.
Thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss Canada's long-term care sector and, specifically, the challenges that we face with workforce shortages and the opportunities that we see through immigration policy.
The Canadian Association for Long Term Care advocates on behalf of Canada’s long-term care sector with a vision for a sustainable system that delivers quality long-term care for all, ensuring that residents live and age with dignity.
I would like to take a moment to express my sincere appreciation for the frontline staff and long-term care leaders who continue to deliver compassionate care and support to residents and families every day in spite of the challenges they face.
Today, I would like to share the current state of long-term care and highlight the specific opportunities for improvement through immigration.
Currently, estimates indicate that nearly double the number of long-term care home spaces will be needed by 2035, and Canada's population aged 85 and older is expected to double by 2040. Wait-lists for long-term care homes are at record highs, with many waiting in hospital beds. This is a direct impact on the broader health system, limiting hospital capacity and often resulting in cancelled surgeries and delayed care due to unavailable beds.
According to Statistics Canada, in the third quarter last year, there were nearly 25,000 vacant positions in the long-term care sector. There is work under way nationally to improve workforce data in long-term care, and this will support longer-term planning and domestic solutions; however, our workforce needs are immediate.
Right now, many internationally educated health care providers begin their Canadian careers as personal support workers in long-term care homes while working through foreign credential recognition processes. Long-term care providers often provide extensive settlement supports, such as assisting with housing, transportation, child care and credential recognition, largely from their own resources.
There is significant interest in working with the economic mobility pathways program to bring skilled refugees to Canada to work in long-term care homes, but the processing delays are significant and the costs make it challenging for many long-term care home employers to consider.
Programs such as the temporary foreign worker program play a critical role in addressing many workforce shortages. However, recent changes to the temporary foreign worker program, including the new labour market impact assessment requirements, have created significant administrative and financial burdens for employers, as they need to complete the same process for each temporary foreign worker every 12 months. This is despite the fact that the labour market impact assessment is meant to assess labour market impact, and in long-term care the shortage is already clear and nationally recognized.
However, there are opportunities to strengthen the long-term care workforce through targeted immigration policies. We ask that we expand and simplify immigration pathways, for example by creating a health care-specific pilot for long-term care. This could build on strengths and lessons learned from the home care worker immigration pilot and the Atlantic immigration program.
We ask that we create a health care-specific work permit that is exempt from the labour market impact assessment. The francophone mobility work permit is a proven model, and it addresses the significant Canadian interest in supporting official-language minority communities. The same regulatory authority could be applied to health care, another sector of national interest.
Prioritize immigration processing in all programs for individuals already working, or committed to working, in the long-term care sector, while reducing the administrative burden for long-term care employers.
In closing, we recognize that Canada’s immigration system must balance many priorities. However, it is essential that we preserve and strengthen what is working, particularly in programs that enable long-term care homes to recruit and retain vital workers.
To illustrate, I’ll share a real-life example that's happening right now. An internationally trained long-term care provider with six years of experience in the Philippines began working at a long-term care home in Prince Edward Island in November 2024 under an open work permit. Her permit expired in July 2025, while her Atlantic immigration program application was still in process. Unfortunately, the open work permit was not renewed, and she is now preparing to return to the Philippines, despite having a full-time position available.
This is precisely the kind of situation that we must avoid. If we want a sustainable long-term care system, we must ensure that immigration policy supports—not hinders—the ability of long-term care homes to meet workforce needs.
Thank you once again for the opportunity to speak with you today.