Evidence of meeting #51 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was decision.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Ned Franks  Professor Emeritus, Department of Political Studies, Queen's University, As an Individual
Margaret Biggs  President, Canadian International Development Agency
Mary Corkery  Executive Director, Canadian Ecumenical Justice Initiatives (KAIROS)
Rob Walsh  Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, House of Commons
Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Michelle Tittley

11:45 a.m.

NDP

Pat Martin NDP Winnipeg Centre, MB

How often does that occur?

11:45 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Mr. Martin, your time is up. Thank you.

We'll move now to a bit of a cleanup round. We've had three rounds, as is the normal practice of this committee. We'll try to get questions from those who have not been able to ask questions yet today.

I'll recognize Mr. Young.

11:45 a.m.

Conservative

Terence Young Conservative Oakville, ON

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Minister, the coalition majority today you've been witness to has been trying to hide information from the public in a number of ways--points of order, motions, and cutting off witnesses repeatedly.

When you were cut off earlier today, were there any specific questions you didn't get a chance to give a complete answer to that you would like to completely answer now?

11:45 a.m.

Conservative

Bev Oda Conservative Durham, ON

Thank you for the opportunity.

I think I have done my best, to the best of my ability, to provide the factual answers to provide the truth. I have tried to answer every specific question that was posed to me as a question. I think I've done that thoroughly. I want to put some facts on the table.

I would never deliberately mislead anyone--anyone in the House or any member of the committee. I sit here before you bringing you the truth and the facts. I recognize that my reputation and integrity are being questioned here. I would tell you that this is the value I live by, I have lived by throughout my life, and I live by every day, whether I am before a committee, in the House, answering questions, or meeting with constituents. This is something that I value very highly.

I also want to put on the record that through a fair and balanced hearing, with open minds willing to hear the facts, understand the explanation of the process undertaken, and understand the limitations of the format used at that point in time, there is no cause to move further. I believe we have done what the Speaker instructed us to do to clarify confusion that may remain.

11:45 a.m.

Conservative

Terence Young Conservative Oakville, ON

Thank you, Minister.

Madam Biggs, were you ever unsure of the minister's decision on this Kairos funding matter?

11:45 a.m.

President, Canadian International Development Agency

11:45 a.m.

Conservative

Terence Young Conservative Oakville, ON

Thank you.

Do you ever make the final decision on matters like this?

March 18th, 2011 / 11:45 a.m.

President, Canadian International Development Agency

Margaret Biggs

There are some decisions the minister has delegated to the department. On these issues, no, the minister has the authority to make the decision.

11:45 a.m.

Conservative

Terence Young Conservative Oakville, ON

So the decision memo sent to the minister was clearly a memo to get a final decision.

11:45 a.m.

President, Canadian International Development Agency

Margaret Biggs

Yes, it was a memo with a recommendation to seek a decision.

11:45 a.m.

Conservative

Terence Young Conservative Oakville, ON

Thank you.

What is the difference between recommending a proposal and ministerial approval?

11:45 a.m.

President, Canadian International Development Agency

Margaret Biggs

Well, a recommendation is a recommendation. It's advice coming from the department and it does not have any authority. The authority comes when the decision is made by the person who has the authority to make the decision.

11:45 a.m.

Conservative

Terence Young Conservative Oakville, ON

Thank you.

Minister, we just heard from expert witness Professor Ned Franks that ministers are required to sign thousands of documents, and you made reference to 758 decisions you were required to make. Were they for CIDA or for different organizations as well? Was that just for CIDA?

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

Bev Oda Conservative Durham, ON

They were just proposals made to CIDA for funding requests through normal channels and through the different branches of CIDA.

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

Terence Young Conservative Oakville, ON

Can you please explain what would happen if you approved every proposal that was put before you for a decision?

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

Bev Oda Conservative Durham, ON

I can't speculate what would happen—

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Excuse me, Minister.

Excuse me, Mr. Young, but I have a point of order.

Mr. Proulx.

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Marcel Proulx Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Mr. Chair, there are 10 minutes left. I was wondering if the Conservative regime members would be generous enough to let the opposition parties ask additional questions, seeing as there are only 10 minutes left.

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Well, of course, taking time out for the points of order will also take time away from that. It was my thought to give a round to the members who hadn't had a chance to ask questions and then do some one-off questions, if time still allowed.

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Marcel Proulx Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC

I see.

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

We may have just used that time, but let's hope we didn't.

Mr. Young, you have about a minute left.

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

Terence Young Conservative Oakville, ON

Thank you, Chair.

Would you like to answer that question, please, Minister?

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

Bev Oda Conservative Durham, ON

I couldn't speculate as to what may happen. What I do know, which is a reality, is that even though our government has doubled its international assistance, even though we met a commitment to double our aid to Africa, we are not able to respond positively to every proposal that is received by CIDA. Consequently, this requires advice from the department and a decision by myself as the minister.

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Thank you, Mr. Young.

Mr. Armstrong.

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

Scott Armstrong Conservative Cumberland—Colchester—Musquodoboit Valley, NS

Thank you for being here, Minister. I'd like to say that when I was brought up, I was brought up with manners. I will ask you questions and I expect you to answer the questions, and I will give you the appropriate time without interrupting, unlike some people on this committee who have done so today.

In my background, I have never been a minister of a government, but I have led organizations and I was a school principal with a fairly large staff. When you lead an organization, many people from many components of your organization will come and ask for a lot of things. The hardest decisions one has to make—and I'm going to ask you if you agree with this—are the ones on budgets. There are a lot of good ideas that are brought to you, and you have the last say. Is that appropriate, as a minister of a federal department?