Evidence of meeting #54 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was document.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Nicolas Auclair  Committee Researcher
Andre Barnes  Committee Researcher

12:15 p.m.

Liberal

Marcel Proulx Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC

That was his echo.

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Page 2: I take the guidance of the committee here. One at a time, or can we do the page?

12:15 p.m.

Liberal

David McGuinty Liberal Ottawa South, ON

The page.

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

Harold Albrecht Conservative Kitchener—Conestoga, ON

One at a time.

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Okay. All in support of number 5?

12:15 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

All in favour of number 6?

12:15 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

All in favour of number 7 the way it sits?

12:15 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

All those in favour of number 8 as written?

12:15 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

All those in favour of number 9?

12:15 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

All in favour of number 10?

12:15 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Great. Look at that: a whole page.

12:15 p.m.

Liberal

Marcel Proulx Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC

In French, it was a page and a half.

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Number 11.

Monsieur Paquette.

12:20 p.m.

Bloc

Pierre Paquette Bloc Joliette, QC

I'd like to talk about the wording here. It refers to a “supplementary report”. Are we not actually talking about an opinion?

This is strictly technical. It says that this report contains a supplementary opinion.

March 24th, 2011 / 12:20 p.m.

Committee Researcher

Nicolas Auclair

Once again, we hesitated somewhat. It must have come that way from the translation service, and we left it. It's the committee report.

12:20 p.m.

Bloc

Pierre Paquette Bloc Joliette, QC

As a general rule, since it is part of the report, it cannot also be a report. It's an opinion.

12:20 p.m.

Committee Researcher

Nicolas Auclair

So, it's a supplementary opinion.

12:20 p.m.

Bloc

Pierre Paquette Bloc Joliette, QC

Also, on the second line it has to be changed to “opinion” again.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Mr. Reid, then Mr. Lukiwski.

Mr. Reid first. On that word?