Evidence of meeting #36 for Citizenship and Immigration in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was detention.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Herbert Grubel  Senior Fellow, Fraser Institute, As an Individual
Janet Cleveland  Psychologist and Researcher, Transcultural Research and Intervention Team, Division of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University
Cécile Rousseau  Professor of Psychiatry and Researcher, Transcultural Research and Intervention Team, Division of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University
Rivka Augenfeld  Spokesperson, Table de concertation des organismes au service des personnes réfugiées et immigrantes
Richard Goldman  Spokesperson, Table de concertation des organismes au service des personnes réfugiées et immigrantes
Dan Bohbot  President, Quebec Immigration Lawyers Association (AQAADI)

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

Roxanne James Conservative Scarborough Centre, ON

Thank you, Madam Chair.

Welcome to all of our guests.

I've listened very carefully to the testimony. I apologize for missing part of yours, Mr. Grubel.

I have to tell you that there's something you said just recently that I'm a little bit concerned about. We know that you have a problem with detention. We understand that. I'm not disputing your personal opinion on that particular issue. You said that you have a problem with people being detained because they arrive with false documents. Before you say anything, I have to tell you that I can't think of a better reason to detain someone than that they arrive with false documents, because we don't know who they are. I'm a little concerned about a statement, made across the board, that you have a problem with detention, and part of it is because people arrive with false documents.

Having said that, I'd like to ask you a very simple question. You were actually going to dispute the number of 41 people from those two vessels being inadmissible to Canada. Regardless of the number you have or the number my colleague said there were, a number of people were actually found to be inadmissible for security reasons or for other reasons, such as war crimes, etc.

If they arrived without documents and with false documents, would you welcome any of those 41 people into your house and take full responsibility for their actions and whereabouts? Or do you think that detention is necessary so that we can identify people who arrive on our border, unannounced, illegally, through human smuggling, in mass arrivals? Do you not think that the Government of Canada owes the citizens of Canada the safety and security we need to give them?

It's a simple yes or no answer, really.

12:45 p.m.

Psychologist and Researcher, Transcultural Research and Intervention Team, Division of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University

Dr. Janet Cleveland

It's not quite, because we get detention and incarceration mixed up. I have absolutely no problem saying, and I fully agree, that we need to check people's identities when they arrive in Canada with false documents or otherwise. The people we interviewed said themselves that they had no problem with that and that there's not a country in the world that lets in terrorists, criminals, and so on. But they asked why you were putting them in prisons and treating them like criminals.

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

Roxanne James Conservative Scarborough Centre, ON

Okay. Thank you.

12:45 p.m.

Psychologist and Researcher, Transcultural Research and Intervention Team, Division of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University

Dr. Janet Cleveland

There are other ways to simply have people in supervised accommodation while you're checking them, and it's done in many countries.

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

Roxanne James Conservative Scarborough Centre, ON

I understand. I'm glad you clarified that you actually agree that detention is necessary to be able—

12:45 p.m.

Psychologist and Researcher, Transcultural Research and Intervention Team, Division of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University

Dr. Janet Cleveland

I said detention as supervised accommodation—

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

Roxanne James Conservative Scarborough Centre, ON

Right.

12:45 p.m.

Psychologist and Researcher, Transcultural Research and Intervention Team, Division of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University

Dr. Janet Cleveland

—but not incarceration.

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

Roxanne James Conservative Scarborough Centre, ON

My second question—

12:45 p.m.

Psychologist and Researcher, Transcultural Research and Intervention Team, Division of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University

12:45 p.m.

NDP

The Vice-Chair (Ms. Jinny Jogindera Sims) NDP Jinny Sims

Could we just have the witness answer? Then I'll come back to you.

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

Roxanne James Conservative Scarborough Centre, ON

Actually, I did have my answer.

Thank you very much, Madam Chair.

I have a second question in addition to that. You have a problem with detention and you have a problem with maybe some of the conditions of detention. But you are aware that Canada meets all of its international obligations, in accordance with our own charter. Actually, we go far beyond many other western countries we're compared against with regard to this particular aspect.

I just remind the committee that this is a very small proportion of the number of people we're talking about. This is not the vast majority of refugees who come into this country. There have been a few hundred over a decade.

You are aware that we meet all of our international obligations and that we are in accordance with our charter. I just want a yes or no answer.

12:45 p.m.

Professor of Psychiatry and Researcher, Transcultural Research and Intervention Team, Division of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University

Dr. Cécile Rousseau

Canada is the only country to have a reservation for the Convention of the Rights of the Child, and this is usually unknown. Do you know that? Do you know what the reservation is?

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

Roxanne James Conservative Scarborough Centre, ON

Are we in--

12:45 p.m.

Professor of Psychiatry and Researcher, Transcultural Research and Intervention Team, Division of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University

Dr. Cécile Rousseau

Do you know what the reservation is?

12:45 p.m.

NDP

The Vice-Chair (Ms. Jinny Jogindera Sims) NDP Jinny Sims

As the chair, I do have to interrupt.

The members of Parliament ask questions—

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

Roxanne James Conservative Scarborough Centre, ON

I just need an answer to—

12:45 p.m.

NDP

The Vice-Chair (Ms. Jinny Jogindera Sims) NDP Jinny Sims

—and I'm going to ask our witnesses to answer those questions.

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

Roxanne James Conservative Scarborough Centre, ON

Thank you so much.

My question is whether you agree that we meet international obligations in accordance with our own charter. It's either a yes or you don't agree with that. In fact, we would have a problem with our current system if that were the case.

12:45 p.m.

Professor of Psychiatry and Researcher, Transcultural Research and Intervention Team, Division of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University

Dr. Cécile Rousseau

I would say that we do not totally respect the convention we have signed.

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

Roxanne James Conservative Scarborough Centre, ON

Okay. And that's your personal opinion. Thank you.

I want to direct my questions now to Mr. Grubel. Again, I apologize....

We're going back to the European Union and the problem we have. Are you aware that 95% of people who come as refugees from the European Union actually withdraw or abandon their applications, even before the first hearing? Are you aware of that? Why do you think that is?

12:45 p.m.

Senior Fellow, Fraser Institute, As an Individual

Herbert Grubel

I'm not a psychologist. Maybe you should ask Madam Cleveland about this. I don't know.

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

Roxanne James Conservative Scarborough Centre, ON

Do you think it has anything to do with the pull factor here in Canada?

We had witnesses come in and talk about our welfare system yesterday. Just as a side note, you were asking about the costing behind this particular bill. It costs Canadian taxpayers $170 million for abandoned claims from the European Union. That's per year. When I talk about 95% of them being abandoned, that is the actual monetary amount it costs people like you and me and all the constituents in my riding of Scarborough Centre. It costs them, hard-working Canadians, to foot that bill of $170 million.

Do you think that's fair to taxpayers?

May 2nd, 2012 / 12:50 p.m.

Senior Fellow, Fraser Institute, As an Individual

Herbert Grubel

It isn't, and that has been the essence of my testimony. I think we should consider all of these issues in the light of what we can afford.

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

Roxanne James Conservative Scarborough Centre, ON

Let me ask you one more question, very quickly.

A large portion of this bill has to do with making sure that legitimate, bona fide refugees can get into Canada, be processed more quickly, and be able to start their new lives here in a very protected country. Do you not think it's important that we get these people processed more quickly and at the same time crack down on those who are abusing our system, who bog down the system, and cause legitimate bona fide refugees to wait up to two years for their applications to be heard in the first hearing? Do you think that's fair?