Debates of June 4th, 2012
House of Commons Hansard #133 of the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was trade.
Topics
- Question Period
- Canada Post Corporation Act
- Points of Order
- Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act
- Olympic Games
- Fisheries and Oceans
- Family Tragedy
- The Environment
- Game on the Hill
- Financial Institutions
- Leader of the New Democratic Party of Canada
- Canadian Forces
- Agriculture and Youth Project
- Nigeria
- Toronto Eaton Centre
- Human Rights
- ALS Awareness Month
- Canadian Forces Day
- The Environment
- New Democratic Party of Canada
- The Environment
- 41st General Election
- The Budget
- Government Spending
- National Defence
- Ministerial Expenditures
- RCMP
- Census
- Fisheries and Oceans
- International Trade
- Employment
- The Environment
- National Defence
- Immigration
- Foreign Affairs
- Employment
- Employment Insurance
- Fisheries and Oceans
- Search and Rescue
- Infrastructure
- Immigration
- Aboriginal Affairs
- International Trade
- Veterans
- Telecommunications
- Presence in Gallery
- Points of Order
- Committees of the House
- Indian Act Amendment and Replacement Act
- Radiocommunication Act
- Petitions
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
- Sixtieth Anniversary of the Reign of Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II
- Canada–Jordan Economic Growth and Prosperity Act
- Business of Supply
- Protecting Canada's Immigration System Act
- Air Canada
- Foreign Affairs
- Science and Technology
Question No. 608
Questions on the Order Paper
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
NDP
Wayne Marston Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, ON
With regard to raising the eligibility requirement for Old Age Security from 65 to 67 years as proposed in Budget 2012: (a) what will be the total impact on the fiscal framework for the fiscal years 2021-2022 to 2025-2026, (i) by year, (ii) by thousands of dollars (inflation-adjusted), (iii) by thousands of dollars (non-inflation adjusted), (iv) by percentage of the amount of planned government spending, (v) by percentage of GDP; and (b) what is the expected decline in recipients for each fiscal year from 2021-2022 to 2025-2026, (i) by number, (ii) by percentage?
Question No. 608
Questions on the Order Paper
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Haldimand—Norfolk
Ontario
Conservative
Diane Finley Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development
Mr. Speaker, to ensure that the old age security, OAS, program remains sustainable, the age of eligibility for OAS and guaranteed income supplement will be gradually increased from 65 to 67, starting in April 2023, with full implementation by January 2029. An 11-year notification period, followed by a six-year phase-in period, is being provided to ensure that individuals have significant advance notification to plan their retirement and make adjustments.
The Chief Actuary is responsible for providing revised expenditure projections to the Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development, HRSD, when legislative changes are made to the OAS program. Once the Chief Actuary has submitted his supplementary report on revised program expenditures to the Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development in the 11th actuarial report on the OAS program, the minister will table it in Parliament within 30 sitting days, as per the Public Pensions Reporting Act. However, the Chief Actuary has provided the government with a preliminary estimate showing that $97.9 billion would be spent on the OAS program in 2030 if the proposed changes are implemented. Without changes, the cost of the OAS program will grow from $38 billion in 2011 to approximately $108.7 billion in 2030. More details on the expenditure impacts of the change in the OAS age of eligibility will be provided once the 11th actuarial report is tabled in Parliament.
If members require information on projections for the OAS program without the change to the age of eligibility, they may refer to the 9th and 10th actuarial reports on the OAS program, the most recent reports available, at http://www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca/osfi/index_e.aspx?DetailID=500.
Question No. 618
Questions on the Order Paper
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
NDP
Carol Hughes Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing, ON
What is the total number of public sector jobs eliminated during the fiscal year 2011-2012 within the constituency of Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing, listing each department or agency by municipality?
Question No. 618
Questions on the Order Paper
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Parry Sound—Muskoka
Ontario
Conservative
Tony Clement President of the Treasury Board and Minister for the Federal Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario
Mr. Speaker, the Treasury Board Secretariat cannot produce employment statistics by riding.
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre
Saskatchewan
Conservative
Tom Lukiwski Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
Mr. Speaker, if Questions Nos. 592, 599 and 603 could be made orders for return, these returns would be tabled immediately.
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Conservative
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
Question No. 592
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Liberal
Scott Brison Kings—Hants, NS
With regard to Table 4.1.1 in Budget 2010 (also included in Table 6.7 of Budget 2012 under Budget 2010 spending restraint): (a) what is the breakdown of expected savings for each department, agency and organization, in each of the fiscal years 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017, and ongoing, for each of the following areas, (i) International Assistance Envelope, (ii) Containing the administrative cost of government, (iii) 2009 strategic reviews; (b) as of Budget 2010, what were the total expected expenditures under the “International Assistance Envelope” for each of the fiscal years 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016, and 2016-2017; (c) which departments, agencies and organizations are included in the “International Assistance Envelope”; and (d) where the full budget of the department, agency, or organization is not included in the calculation of the “International Assistance Envelope”, (i) which components of that department, agency, or organization are included in the envelope and which are not, (ii) for those components included in the envelope what is the breakdown of their funding by vote or statutory authority?
(Return tabled)
Question No. 599
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
June 4th, 2012 / 3:20 p.m.
Liberal
David McGuinty Ottawa South, ON
With respect to greenhouse gas emissions: (a) what particular programs or initiatives was the Minister of Natural Resources referring to in the statement that “since 2006, our government has invested more than $10 billion to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and build a more sustainable environment” (interview with The Hill Times published Monday, August 16, 2010); (b) what is the full breakdown of that spending; (c) for each program in (a), (i) what was the total amount of emissions reductions which resulted, (ii) how was the amount of reduction quantified and by whom; and (d) for all programs included in the $10 billion expenditure, what was the average cost per unit of greenhouse gas emissions reduced?
(Return tabled)
Question No. 603
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Liberal
Kevin Lamoureux Winnipeg North, MB
With regard to Aboriginal affairs, what are the dates and reference or file numbers of all and any reports submitted to or prepared by, for, or on behalf of Aboriginal and Northern Affairs Canada, or its predecessor departments Indian and Northern Affairs Canada or Indian Affairs and Northern Development, concerning the conduct of any of the following: (a) band council or First Nation elections in Natuashish, including the former community of Utshimassits or Davis Inlet; (b) band council or First Nation elections in Sheshatshiu; (c) band council or First Nation referenda or plebiscites in Natuashish, including the former community of Utshimassits or Davis Inlet; (d) Innu Nation elections or by-elections; (e) Innu Nation referenda or plebiscites; and (f) Innu Nation votes connected with the Innu Nation land claims and self government process, including the June 30, 2011, vote on the New Dawn/Tshash Petapen agreement?
(Return tabled)
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Conservative
Tom Lukiwski Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
Mr. Speaker, I ask that the remaining questions be allowed to stand?
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
3:20 p.m.
Conservative
