House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was research.

Last in Parliament May 2004, as Liberal MP for Madawaska—Restigouche (New Brunswick)

Won his last election, in 2000, with 52% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Highway System March 21st, 2002

Mr. Speaker, I live in Edmunston, New Brunswick, one of the maritime provinces of the beautiful Atlantic region. This region in eastern Canada has much to offer tourists from the rest of Canada and the rest of the world. The people of my region like to visit our cousins in Quebec and in the other provinces in the east, centre, and west of this country, but they also like to welcome them to their part of the country.

If this superb corner of the country is to be able to show off its true worth, and if the tourist industry is to be bolstered, we need to have proper highways available to potential visitors. The roads from Rivière-du-Loup to the New Brunswick border need to be improved, that is highway 185 and the section of highway 2 from the N.B. border, at Edmunston, to Fredericton.

On a number of occasions in the past, the Prime Minister has indicated that this highway project was a priority for his government. The people back home remember this and they feel the time has come to stop talking about the project and to start taking steps to make it happen: a four lane highway from Rivière-du-Loup, in Quebec, to Fredericton, in New Brunswick.

You will always be welcome to visit my part of the country, Mr. Speaker.

Research and Development March 13th, 2002

Mr. Speaker, perhaps the member should have listened to my answer rather than reading his second question.

Once again, further to the recommendations of the committee, the minister has made a commitment to introduce legislation in the House before May 10. That is what was said, and the member should listen.

It is important to realize that I too was a member of this committee. It is true that we heard from many witnesses. It is a very complex issue that is of interest to all Canadians, and for this reason, we took quite some time in preparing our report.

Once the bill is introduced, it will be discussed in the House and then it will be referred to the committee, before coming back for third reading. That is what is happening.

Research and Development March 13th, 2002

Mr. Speaker, I remind the House that on Monday the minister informed the House that she will be introducing a bill in the House before May 10, further to the recommendations of the Standing Committee on Health, of which my colleague is a member, for the very purpose of addressing this issue.

It is also important to understand that CIHR, which was also to provide funding for research dealing specifically, in this case, with embryonic stem cells, was to provide guidelines, and that is what has been done.

Bioterrorism March 1st, 2002

If people will listen, I will answer.

It must be realized, however, that training people requires a structure to be in place. This is not the place for band-aid solutions. We have to know where we are headed. That is what we are doing. We are putting it in place at present and will continue throughout the year.

Bioterrorism March 1st, 2002

Mr. Speaker, we take any possible threat of bioterrorist attacks very seriously. What I was going to say was that in the past week, training courses have been started on the response to bioterrorist attack.

Bioterrorism March 1st, 2002

Mr. Speaker, I believe this is a very important question for all Canadians. I am pleased to inform my colleague of our position.

It is already well known that we are prepared at this time to deal with the possibility of an attack using smallpox, should this ever occur. As I have already said here in the House, this threat affects perhaps the entire planet. It requires co-operation, by the various governments involved throughout the world, and by the various agencies on the provincial level.

As for preparations for a potential attack, the minister has reported on what is being done at the present time—

Supply February 19th, 2002

Mr. Speaker, I will start by answering the second part of the question asked by my colleague.

The provinces will continue to wait at the door to try to obtain more funding. It is human nature, and we know that. Let us not forget that all the provinces are receiving funding every year under the agreement signed by all of them in September 2000, and that funding will continue to increase each year over the next three years.

We can debate the figures and say that it is 14%, 18% or 20%, but the 14% figure refers only to the portion paid under the Canada health and social transfer. We know full well that the CHST accounts for only 41% of total health transfers.

There are obviously other amounts that are transferred in support of health, but the opposition has a tendency to ignore them.

Supply February 19th, 2002

Mr. Speaker, the Government of Canada has clearly demonstrated that it has not withdrawn from the Canadian health care system.

First, in September 2000, a five year agreement was reached with the provinces and territories to maintain stability and meet the demand in order to have a longer term vision of what the funding would be.

Then, last fall, the Romanow commission, in co-operation with all the provinces working on this issue, looked at ways of renewing and improving our health care system.

I do not see that as a withdrawal. On the contrary, I think the government is totally committed to ensuring that the system is there for the next 25 or 30 years. We know full well that the system needs to be improved and fine tuned to meet the needs of all Canadians, from all provinces, including Quebec.

Supply February 19th, 2002

Mr. Speaker, thank you for this opportunity to address the opposition's motion.

Canada's publicly funded health care system is a partnership between the Government of Canada and the provinces and territories. While the provinces and territories are responsible for the organization and delivery of health care services in their respective jurisdictions, the Government of Canada sets the national principles that provinces and territories must comply with to receive their full cash contributions under the Canada health and social transfer program. This shared role requires us to work in close co-operation with one another.

As members know, the federal health minister is the minister responsible for the administration of the Canada Health Act. This responsibility involves the monitoring of provincial and territorial health systems to ensure that they adhere to the criteria and principles of the Canada Health Act.

The Canada Health Act, passed by parliament in 1984, is the cornerstone of the Canadian health care system and forms the basis of medicare. This legislation affirms the Government of Canada's commitment to a universal, accessible, comprehensive, portable and publicly administered health insurance system. Canadians identify with Canada's health care system more than with any other social program in this country.

Health Canada's approach to resolving possible Canada Health Act non-compliance issues emphasizes transparency, consultation and dialogue. Our ultimate goal is to ensure that the underlying principles of our public health care system are protected for the benefit of all Canadians. In working with the provinces and territories, we are putting a much needed emphasis on making the health care system more accountable and responsive to Canadians.

In his 1999 report, the Auditor General of Canada recommended that Health Canada improve its capacity to monitor provincial and territorial compliance with the Canada Health Act. In response to this recommendation, Health Canada increased spending on the administration of the Canada Health Act by $4 million a year, up from $1.5 million a year. These additional resources have been targeted to enable the department to better monitor and assess provincial and territorial compliance with the act.

These resources are also being used to enhance the department's knowledge and understanding of provincial and territorial legislative frameworks for health insurance. To achieve these objectives, the Canada Health Act Division relies on the support of the six Health Canada regional offices.

Finally, these additional resources have been used to develop a new Canada Health Act Information System, which assists the department to better monitor and assess provincial and territorial compliance with the Canada Health Act.

I am glad to say that with the additional resources committed to improving the administration of the Canada Health Act, the Government of Canada's capacity to fulfill the expectations of Canadians has remained strong.

Under the Canada Health Act, all Canadians must have access to medically necessary health services on uniform terms and conditions. Canadians continue to attach a high importance to each of the five principles in the act.

The act itself comprises five criteria, two conditions, and two provisions. The five criteria of the Canada Health Act require that provincial and territorial health insurance plans be: universal, accessible, comprehensive, portable and publicly administered.

The Canada Health Act requires that the provinces and territories provide the necessary and required information to the Government of Canada for the purpose of bettering the administration of the act, and for reporting to parliament. Also provinces and territories are required to recognize the Government of Canada's contribution towards insured health services and extended health care services.

Finally, there are two additional provisions of the Canada Health Act. The first provision relates to extra billing by physicians. This provision prohibits direct charges to patients by physicians in addition to the amount they receive from the provincial or territorial health insurance plan for insured physician services. The second provision relates to user charges. Its purpose is to prohibit provinces and territories from allowing individuals to be charged for any other insured services.

The Canada Health Act serves as the Government of Canada's guarantee to Canadians that the health care system of this country will be safeguarded and secure. Canadians expect their government to continue to support and protect the values that they hold most dear.

As I mentioned earlier, the act is closely linked with the Canada health and social transfer payments. In order for the provinces and territories to qualify for a full cash contribution under the transfer, they and their health insurance plans must comply with the criteria, conditions and provisions set out in the act.

In September 2001, the Prime Minister announced a $18.9 billion increase in CHST cash transfers to the provinces and territories over the next five years, in support of health. For the fiscal year 2005-2006 alone, the sum total of CHST cash transfers will reach $21 billion, or an increase of about 35% above the current level.

It is through co-operative spirit and joint collaboration between the federal, provincial and territorial governments that the Government of Canada continues to be mindful and respectful of provincial and territorial governments, their mandates and our respective jurisdictional boundaries.

That is why, in the event of provincial or territorial non-compliance with the Canada Health Act, the act identifies a process that the federal minister must follow to try to resolve the issue. Through this process, the federal Minister of Health and her counterpart in the province and/or territory begin discussions about the potential violation. If non-compliance is confirmed and a resolution cannot be achieved through these negotiations, the federal Minister of Health may opt to invoke either of the sanction mechanisms of the Canada Health Act.

It is very important to know that the purpose of the sanction mechanisms is not to impose penalties on the provinces and territories, but rather to achieve compliance to the principles of the act.

The two sanction mechanisms allowed for in the act are the mandatory and the discretionary sanctions.

The mandatory sanction requires dollar-for-dollar deductions to a province's or territory's allocation of the Canada health and social transfer. This dollar-for-dollar figure is based on the amount equal to the charges in extra billing or user fees that have been charged to patients.

The discretionary sanction is imposed if the federal Minister of Health is of the opinion that a province or territory has not complied with one of the five criteria or the two conditions of the Canada Health Act. This would result in a reduction in the amount of transfer payments depending upon the severity of the violation.

To date, the discretionary sanction has not been used by the Government of Canada, the objective of the government being to resolve outstanding issues in a co-operative and collaborative manner.

It is important to remember that the Canada Health Act is a legislative framework of broad principles and criteria, which allows for flexibility in its interpretation and application. This act differs from other legislative frameworks because it is accommodating to the evolving changes and trends which are occurring in the health sector.

Contrary to what some critics of the Canada Health Act may say, the act is not a straitjacket. This does not preclude provinces and territories from implementing appropriate reforms. The Canada Health Act is broad in its interpretation, application and scope. Its purpose is to preserve the values embedded in our health care system, those of equity, accessibility and quality.

In this new century, the dynamics of the health sector are changing every day. There have been many shifts in health care, and reform has occurred across the country with respect to the provision and delivery of health care services. Canadians expect the Government of Canada to lead in the discussion around new ideas and alternatives in its approach to their health.

That is why, on April 4, 2001, the Prime Minister announced the launch of the Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, led by Roy Romanow. The mandate of the commission is to engage Canadians in a national debate on the future of Canada's health care system. This task is an important one in light of increasing complexities in the system coupled with the rising expectations of Canadians.

Canadians expect the Government of Canada to protect health care in this country as a symbol of their national identity. Work is continuing on monitoring, compliance assessment and reporting on the Canada Health Act. Health Canada and the provinces and territories are working diligently in developing a Canada Health Act dispute avoidance and resolution process.

The Government of Canada is committed to the principles and conditions of the Canada Health Act. Through renewed spirit and collective co-operation between the two levels of government in this country, Canadians can be assured that the Government of Canada will continue to sustain and strengthen their medicare system.

National Horse of Canada Act February 18th, 2002

Mr. Speaker, in fact, the member wants to know which of the statements made at that time is the right version.

Twice calls were made to Bayer to find out if it could supply Cipro, and it could not do it at that time. Again, the minister wanted to make sure that we had the drug needed to deal with a potential anthrax attack. We had to be certain that we had this drug should we face such an attack.

So the right version is that two calls were indeed made to Bayer, and the company could not meet our needs. Later it said that it could supply the drug to us in less than 48 hours, should we need it.