House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was reform.

Last in Parliament April 1997, as Reform MP for Lethbridge (Alberta)

Won his last election, in 1993, with 53% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Petitions April 26th, 1996

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36, it is my pleasure to present the following petition which has 449 signatures. I present it on behalf of the petitioners and on behalf of a very concerned constituent, Mrs. Lori Smith.

The petitioners pray and request that Parliament proceed immediately with amendments to the Criminal Code that ensure the sentence given to anyone convicted of driving while impaired or causing injury or death while impaired reflects both the severity of the crime and zero tolerance toward the crime.

This is certainly a commitment and concern of my constituents they would like the Government of Canada to meet.

Ethics April 26th, 1996

Mr. Speaker, I would like to seek the unanimous consent of the House to move the following motion:

That this House support the truth, integrity and ethics in politics and the belief that a politician's promise should be upheld, including a promise to resign.

I would like to hear individually from each party as to how its members feel on this motion. The Reform Party certainly supports the motion. I would appreciate unanimous consent to proceed with debate.

Canada Pension Plan April 18th, 1996

Mr. Speaker, could the Minister of Finance indicate that in follow-up public accounts this unfunded liability will be noted and that the government is prepared to accept it on a long term basis, rather than the present situation where there is not a commitment either by public accounts, as noted, or by the finance minister?

Canada Pension Plan April 18th, 1996

Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Finance said once in his career that he would like to eliminate the GST. When one reads the fine print in the red book it says, not so.

The Minister of Finance has said here today that the government wants to guarantee the Canada pension program. When one reads the public accounts, not so.

What will the Minister of Finance do to guarantee to pensioners across Canada that they will have their Canada pension guaranteed most likely in writing by the government and the minister?

Points Of Order March 28th, 1996

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order on what is happening here. I would refer to page 6 of Beauchesne in terms of Speakers' rulings.

Mr. Speaker, you made a ruling that there was not a point of privilege. You then followed that by saying the matter was one of debate and that is where you left it.

The House leader for the Liberal Party has stood in his place and challenged the Speaker on a ruling. According to Beauchesne, it is very clear, Mr. Speaker, that you are the authority. You are the person elected by the House and once a decision has been made that is the decision of the House.

If the House leader for the Liberal Party wishes to challenge your authority, then he had better do it on that basis and under no other guise.

The decision has been made and it should stand as is.

Points Of Order March 28th, 1996

Mr. Speaker, on a point of order, you have ruled on this matter. You have ruled on the House leader.

Points Of Order March 28th, 1996

Mr. Speaker, on a point of order-

The Late Ernest Charles Manning March 21st, 1996

Mr. Speaker, on behalf of my colleagues, I would also like to pay tribute to Mr. Manning, as I called him for many, many years.

In the annals of Canadian history, Ernest Charles Manning will be remembered as a statesman, a leader and a builder. Over the course of some 25 years as the premier of Alberta, he led Albertans from the poverty and destitution of the depression to the prosperity and affluence of today.

Inheriting a financially bankrupt treasury in 1935, he left Alberta debt free. Some 30 per cent of the budget of the Alberta government was cash in the bank when he left. That is a tremendous record and something we do not always see today.

At the time Mr. Manning took over in 1935, the bankers of the day were not willing to provide Alberta with money, nor was the Government of Canada. He had a very difficult time to start within that depression era. Presiding over the development of the oil and gas industry which reversed the province's fortunes, Mr. Manning made possible the economic, social and educational infrastructure which exists today in Alberta.

On the national scene he played a leading role in bringing the concerns of western Canadians to the halls of power in Ottawa. As the Prime Minister said very well, he participated in every federal-provincial conference from Mackenzie King to Pierre Trudeau and spent 13 years as a senator where he became the leading advocate for the reform of that institution. He has left his mark on our province of Alberta and our country Canada.

When I speak of Mr. Manning today, I pay tribute to the man himself, one whom I considered to be a teacher, a mentor and a very close friend. I had the honour and privilege of serving in Mr. Manning's government and cabinet for five years. The lessons I learned during that period of time remain with me today and will remain with me for the rest of my life.

There are lessons we would all do well to learn. Above all, they centre around three basic words: honesty, integrity and fairness. Mr. Manning stood for something at all times. Everything he did, every action he took was grounded in a very firm moral conviction.

Every decision he reached was in the embodiment of a fundamental principle. Mixed into that principle always was this element of fairness.

When groups would come to make presentations to us as a cabinet, he made sure that both sides were heard and that everybody was able to understand the problem. In the final analysis he was able to pick out of the conversation the key thing that had to be decided, then he would ask cabinet: "Is this what we are deciding? Is it fair and is it right for our people?" At that point we would make a decision and proceed. It was a very open, democratic process.

Every policy he brought forward in Alberta was sought to realize his goal of creating an environment in which each individual could have the freedom and resources to reach their full potential and make a contribution to society. A central characteristic of Mr. Manning was his strong ethical grounding, his sense of moral centre. It acted as his compass and the guiding means of his conduct in his government.

There was no room for favouritism in Mr. Manning's Alberta. There were no kickbacks, there were no grafts. It simply was not done. Even members of the business community who were very suspicious of social credit in its beginning came to respect him and to trust him. When he gave them his word, they knew it was good, and it was.

I remember many of our experiences together: the medicare discussions; the locating of the University of Lethbridge in southern Alberta; CPR's relocation in Calgary; meeting with the Metis people of northern Alberta; the paper on human resources development; the book on political realignment. I remember the one day in his office about a week before he resigned as premier when he sat back in his chair, pulled the right bottom drawer open and said to me: "There are many new things to do yet, Ray. I have a drawerful". His thoughts were always about the future and not on the past.

Mr. Manning, in his deeds and actions, set a standard by which all politicians are measured. A man of dignity and integrity, a devoted Christian and a loving father, he was a credit to his profession. Taken from us at the age of 87 he will be missed as a leader in our communities, missed by his family, by his son, by his province, by his country, but we are all richer, warmer and wiser for the great experience of having known him.

Communications March 20th, 1996

Mr. Speaker, that answer just is not good enough. Competition in this country is being thwarted and stopped by that government policy. It has to change.

Other people support that position such as the Friends of Canadian Broadcasting. The British and Australian governments have made representations to the government saying that the current policy should change. The International Federation of Film Producers has threatened to take Canada to the World Trade Organization because of this type of attitude. Also some Canadians do not agree.

The government knows of these objections. Why is it continuing a policy that was brought about by the CRTC?

Communications March 20th, 1996

This dramatic flip-flop occurred right after Power DirecTv decided that it wanted to throw in the towel.

My question is for the Deputy Prime Minister. What happened to the Liberal government's policy of competition in the direct to home industry?