Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 2461-2475 of 2495
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Supply  Furthermore it drives a massive underground economy. The very people burdened by the GST are the hard working Canadians, people like contractors who provide services for other people. It is a natural tendency to say “I am so overburdened by the regressive taxation system in this country, I will tell you what.

November 6th, 1997House debate

Jim PankiwReform

Income Tax Conventions Implementation Act, 1997  They have decided for policy reasons to tax that pension system at the front end when the taxpayer earns the money and pays into the system rather than when he retires and collects from it. Imagine the case of a hard working Canadian taxpayer who goes across the border to find gainful employment in the United States because there are not enough jobs in Canada. Under American law a portion of their paycheque is taken off at source and sent to the U.S. federal treasury to fund their social security benefits.

October 20th, 1997House debate

Jason KenneyReform

Income Tax Budget Amendments Act, 1996  The member from Winnipeg has been honest with Canadians in pointing that out. There have been $10 billion in increases on hard working Canadian taxpayers. Ultimately the Canada pension plan will not be put on a sustainable footing. I am glad the member from Winnipeg had the courage to point that out. He deserves some credit.

April 10th, 1997House debate

Monte SolbergReform

Supply  The finance minister said the CPP premium increase was not a payroll tax, that it was an investment. I would like him to convince hard working Canadians who are deeper in debt than they have ever been and are having difficult times making ends meet that this is an investment. Canadians are not looking for investments. They are looking for tax relief so they can start meeting the bills that come due weekly.

March 12th, 1997House debate

Ed HarperReform

Liberal Party  Speaker, I am here to tell you that just because the upper echelon of who's who in this country thinks that, I do not believe the average hard working Canadian, or student or senior citizen can hear them. Now hear me out. I am hearing that these old parties are out of touch. They no longer represent the average Canadian. This could be just hearsay, but I clearly suspect the truth of the matter is that these Liberals will be here today and gone tomorrow.

March 5th, 1997House debate

Randy WhiteReform

Employment  That is the Prime Minister's do nothing job strategy. On another point I want to congratulate every hard working Canadian for contributing a total of $26 billion over the past three years toward reducing the federal deficit. I am pleased the Prime Minister has acknowledged their contribution. These Canadians are solely responsible for reducing our federal deficit and the Prime Minister must not take any credit for this.

March 3rd, 1997House debate

Jag BhaduriaLiberal

The Budget  When they need more money for bigger government, bigger bureaucracy, bigger payments and bigger programs they dip into their cash register, the pockets of hard working Canadians. The average Canadian family has seen its disposable household income shrink by $3,000 under the Liberal government. Every reputable economist in the country will testify to that, but the Liberals are in denial.

February 20th, 1997House debate

Dick HarrisReform

The Budget  Liberal members pad their own pockets first and then ensure that their way is paid for by higher premiums and higher taxes from ordinary hard working Canadians. This budget is a fudge it budget. It has not told the complete story about what is going on in the country. The government has proven that it is disconnected from what is going on in the country.

February 20th, 1997House debate

Monte SolbergReform

The Budget  Unemployment is at a record level in this country and he has offered no tax relieve to take care of that. Only last Friday he imposed yet another $10 billion tax grab on hard working Canadians. Will the minister explain for the benefit of Canadians how this $10 billion CPP tax grab is going to help Canadians keep their jobs, help the 1.5 million Canadians who are out of work to get jobs?

February 19th, 1997House debate

Dick HarrisReform

Finance  This government's record which was described by looking through such rosy coloured spectacles is really nothing very much to brag about. This government offers no tax cuts, no relief for all the hard working Canadians who are wondering how to make ends meet. The only thing the government did was to take money away from Canadians to the tune of $25 billion to eliminate the deficit, another $7 billion away from Canadians by downloading on the provinces.

December 9th, 1996House debate

Herb GrubelReform

The Deficit  Through balanced, effective spending cuts, by 1997 we will have reduced the deficit by $33 billion, nearly 80 per cent. What does this all mean for hard working Canadians? It means lower interest rates. It means they are saving almost $500 annually on a $15,000 car loan. It means saving $3,000 on a one-year $100,000 mortgage. It means the economy is improving and jobs are being created.

November 1st, 1996House debate

Maurizio BevilacquaLiberal

Liberal Government  The Liberals have not delivered on jobs, they have not delivered on child care, on the CBC, on the GST, on medicare, on drug patents, in short on anything that is important to the quality of life for hard working Canadians. If the Liberals who still have an ounce of attachment to their old tradition of building rather than destroying institutions do not stand up to the Fraser Institute interloper who poses as the finance minister, the Liberals will erode-

September 25th, 1996House debate

Bill BlaikieNDP

Excise Tax Act  This would give the federal government the ability to reduce its current tax hauls from hard working Canadians and give them back their disposable income which will then be spent more efficiently and effectively. They know how to spend their money on their needs better than the government knows how to spend it on their behalf on what it perceives to be their needs.

April 20th, 1994House debate

Jim SilyeReform

Supply  I will have some remarks of my own in respect of the Senate. I have made them in the past. That is fair game. However, there are many hard working Canadians in the Senate and for hon. members opposite to make those remarks is improper, in my view, and contrary to our rules and practices. The motion before the House is questionable.

May 28th, 1996House debate

Peter MillikenLiberal

Gasoline Prices  This price fixing practice has long been a ploy by the gasoline industry to rob money from the pockets of hard working Canadians. Various individuals and groups have suggested a boycott of these gasoline companies. I have also asked the government to legislate an end to these price fixing tactics. To date nothing has been done and these multinationals continue to reap the benefits.

May 6th, 1996House debate

Jag BhaduriaLiberal