Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 256-266 of 266
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Justice committee  I'm sorry, I shouldn't have interrupted you.

October 26th, 2010Committee meeting

Paula Clarke

Justice committee  We used the same definition that is provided under subsection 354(3), for consistency. At the time this was drafted, this was a definition that was consistent with industry practices. I think that if you want to look at the issues of letters as well, that would be covered under “mark”.

October 26th, 2010Committee meeting

Paula Clarke

Justice committee  Not that I've ever come across. That doesn't mean it's not out there, but I have researched case law and I haven't seen that.

October 26th, 2010Committee meeting

Paula Clarke

Justice committee  That's right.

October 26th, 2010Committee meeting

Paula Clarke

Justice committee  With regard to the VIN, I think if you look at a plain definition of the wording used, it refers to a “number”. Normally in the course of using a VIN, it's an 18-digit number. But when you look at provincial licence plates, they have numbers and letters. So I think even with just a straight interpretation of this definition, it would exclude provincial licence plates.

October 26th, 2010Committee meeting

Paula Clarke

Justice committee  I have just one more point to make. I'm not an expert on licence plates, but a licence plate is used to trace a given vehicle--not necessarily based on its make or model--to an owner. It's the process of identifying the person who owns the car. The vehicle identification number is the process of saying this car, for instance, was made in this factory, it is this make and model, and it is this year.

October 26th, 2010Committee meeting

Paula Clarke

Justice committee  That's right.

October 26th, 2010Committee meeting

Paula Clarke

Justice committee  That's correct.

October 26th, 2010Committee meeting

Paula Clarke

Justice committee  Yes, that's correct. Joyriding is not a lesser and included offence, but actually a separate offence, and it is possible to be charged and convicted for both.

October 26th, 2010Committee meeting

Paula Clarke

Justice committee  Yes, discretion is left with the prosecutors to decide on any given offence--but in this case in particular a third or subsequent offence--whether the facts of the case warrant proceeding by indictment, thus going after the six-month mandatory minimum penalty, or whether a summary conviction is the most appropriate course to take in a given fact situation.

October 26th, 2010Committee meeting

Paula Clarke

Justice committee  The previous two convictions would not apply to joyriding. That's a separate offence under the Criminal Code. So it would have to be three convictions under the new offence of motor vehicle theft.

June 3rd, 2009Committee meeting

Paula Clarke