Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Environment committee That's private investment, so it's not the city buying it. It's not a technology that we sell, because sometimes for waste management the model is to sell the technology that then needs to be upgraded by the municipality.
June 10th, 2014Committee meeting
Marie-Hélène Labrie
Environment committee The business model is a biorefinery. We sell value-added products, ethanol or biomethanol.
June 10th, 2014Committee meeting
Marie-Hélène Labrie
Environment committee Because we're taking municipal solid waste in this case, we get a tipping fee from the municipality. Usually municipalities have to pay a tipping fee to landfills. We're providing them with a competitive value proposition. Instead of landfilling, they actually pay us and we then invest, create those jobs—
June 10th, 2014Committee meeting
Marie-Hélène Labrie
Environment committee It's very similar—
June 10th, 2014Committee meeting
Marie-Hélène Labrie
Environment committee Exactly. It's really a biorefinery using waste. We have a competitive advantage over our competitors, who have to pay for the feedstock—
June 10th, 2014Committee meeting
Marie-Hélène Labrie
Environment committee And paying a tipping fee.
June 10th, 2014Committee meeting
Marie-Hélène Labrie
Environment committee I think municipalities are all going through their strategic planning and the next steps for them. They have already had to deal with how to optimize their recycling, what they do with food waste. Many of them are looking at the next steps. The City of Toronto is doing the same.
June 10th, 2014Committee meeting
Marie-Hélène Labrie
Environment committee Yes, but that is not the case; it's quite high. On average, based on the Waste Business Journal, in the U.S., for example, it's about $45, and that does not include—if I remember it well—the transportation costs. In many municipalities, when you look at the total cost, it's above $80 or $100 per tonne.
June 10th, 2014Committee meeting
Marie-Hélène Labrie
Environment committee We've invested about $100 million.
June 10th, 2014Committee meeting
Marie-Hélène Labrie
Environment committee I guess it's cheaper for us, given that this is one of the sources of energy we use even though an important part of our process is energy self-sufficiency. But we're not competing with natural gas as we are really producing a replacement for gasoline instead of producing electricity.
June 10th, 2014Committee meeting
Marie-Hélène Labrie
Environment committee There are several important aspects to this. First, there has to be continued support for the commercialization of innovation. It is very important to be involved, and not only at the research and development stage. It is very important to make sure that those innovations that have the potential to be profitable be able to get through what we call in finance the “valley of death”.
June 10th, 2014Committee meeting
Marie-Hélène Labrie
Environment committee The first one is about stimulating cleantech innovation. I think the expert in this is probably Céline Bak from Analytical Advisors. She has been following the sector for more than five years. I think the return on job creation is enormous. In terms of the export potential, it's also great.
June 10th, 2014Committee meeting
Marie-Hélène Labrie
Environment committee Per year.
June 10th, 2014Committee meeting
Marie-Hélène Labrie
Environment committee And on retaining that biofuel so that we can generate the reductions here in GHGs rather than in the U.S....
June 10th, 2014Committee meeting
Marie-Hélène Labrie
Environment committee Natural Resources Canada is a partner for our research and pilot projects mainly. We were not able to benefit from the ecoENERGY initiative for biofuels because the timing of our commercial production was such that we could not apply under this program. We do receive funding for a research project on airplane fuel under the ecoENERGY initiative for innovation.
June 10th, 2014Committee meeting
Marie-Hélène Labrie