Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 36
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Penalties in terms of parliamentarians or the government?

May 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Donald Sproule

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I'm really not an expert or at liberty to say, but—

May 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Donald Sproule

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I think the key thing for me is to know that government is still functioning. I come back to the committees; that was the one thing that we wanted. We understand that it's a complex issue. We wanted to make sure the proper debate happened in the public domain, and that's why the continued working of the committees would have been of real benefit to us.

May 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Donald Sproule

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Being the head of an organization with 17,500 pensioners, I'm now entering the political realm myself, and I think one of the key things is to understand what the people want. I would, then, support the idea of this going in front of Parliament and getting the wishes of Parliament tabled rather than it being a government decision.

May 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Donald Sproule

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Thank you very much.

May 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Donald Sproule

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Correct. But I do believe that we were hoping to get some of this to committees as well, and the committees did cease, is that not correct, during prorogation?

May 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Donald Sproule

Procedure and House Affairs committee  In our case, I think the one recommendation is the period in which the House is prorogued. I do believe, if I am correct, in the Ontario legislature they prorogued and then a couple of days later continued on. So it's a question of the business of Parliament coming to a halt during prorogation and for how long.

May 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Donald Sproule

May 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Donald Sproule

May 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Donald Sproule

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Right. And that was one of our objectives, to make sure that the debate had the visibility in terms of the broader population and the MPs.

May 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Donald Sproule

May 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Donald Sproule

May 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Donald Sproule

May 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Donald Sproule

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Yes, that very definitely would have been of benefit to us, if the committee could have continued during prorogation. I agree.

May 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Donald Sproule

May 13th, 2010Committee meeting

Donald Sproule