Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-23 of 23
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Yes, because if you look at the list we have, the economic increases for employees.... We have the pay for the additional employees, who are obviously indeterminate, that we need to keep supporting.

November 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Daniel G. Paquette

Procedure and House Affairs committee  When we look at even just what we have here in the supplementary estimates (B), which is the big portion, the majority of the amount there is our carry-forward, the 5% over last year, which is basically unspent voted authorities from the previous year that are distributed after that, based on the rules we have, to MPs, House administration, or some of the strategic priorities.

November 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Daniel G. Paquette

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Of the close to $15 million of carry-forward, $6.7 million of it was redistributed to the various MPs' budgets, based on the formula we have for the underspent from the previous year's authorities, for them to use in their current year's expenses. There's $1.8 million going to various House administration service areas, again on that same formula of the underspending, to be spent on in-year events.

November 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Daniel G. Paquette

Procedure and House Affairs committee  For the supplementary estimates (B), the majority of it is one-time. That includes the carry-forward of the $15 million, and about 40% of the balance is one-time funding. It's just the in-year projects and initiatives.

November 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Daniel G. Paquette

Procedure and House Affairs committee  The big piece here is the additional 30 members added to the House and the impact of having the additional constituency offices and their staff, which makes up about $20 million worth of that amount of increase. A lot of the money in the supplementary estimates is for technology projects.

November 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Daniel G. Paquette

Procedure and House Affairs committee  The need for additional capacity there is due to a combination of things. One of them is with the continued increase in resources for members and House administration, we need to bring the number of pay advisers up to maintain a ratio to maintain the service. There has also been an increase in inquiries relating to pension benefits, specifically for members, and there's a need for a subject matter expert on staff to do this.

November 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Daniel G. Paquette

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Yes. At this point, they are two different entities. They get their own funding and their own votes for that. We work very closely together to make sure there is no overlap and that any gaps are addressed, but at this point there are two different entities and two different budgets that need to be managed separately.

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Daniel G. Paquette

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Daniel G. Paquette