Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 46-60 of 94
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Finance committee  Yes, it probably makes sense to stand back and take a look at the system as a whole. A particular area that might merit from further examination is the sales tax side, especially in the context of the harmonization of sales taxes that is taking place across the country. A lot of

October 27th, 2011Committee meeting

Ian Russell

Finance committee  Thank you, Mr. Chairman. It's a pleasure to be here this morning in Saskatoon. I represent the Investment Industry Association of Canada, which is the trade association for the Canadian securities industry. We represent 200 investment dealer firms coast to coast across the coun

October 27th, 2011Committee meeting

Ian Russell

Finance committee  I thought it was a good question that you asked. I was thinking about the budget change during Mr. Hayes' remarks, and I would agree with Mr. Hayes that it's probably a bit too early to assess the impact that change has had.

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Ian Russell

Finance committee  I'd say a similar thing: the larger companies have come to the markets in the last two years and have tended to accumulate fair amounts of cash. Part of it is because of uncertainty, but I also think part of it is looking for opportunity as well. Particularly when you're looking

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Ian Russell

Finance committee  I guess my comment on that would be the slogan that was used at the Carter commission, which goes back 40 years now: “A buck is a buck is a buck”. What we're trying to indicate here is that there are certain investments and certain income flows, certain capital gains, and parti

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Ian Russell

Finance committee  I don't know. What I'm saying now is that the effect of capital gains tax is 25%, whether it's 20% capital gains tax or 22%. I'm just saying that to make it lower would provide an additional incentive to—

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Ian Russell

Finance committee  I guess it depends on whether you—

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Ian Russell

Finance committee  If the ultimate result were the same, you could change the inclusion rate and lower the tax rate. You're right, you could get to the same result.

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Ian Russell

Finance committee  You're right, and it's for two reasons. One is that the statistics look at the average usage across different income groups. Lower-income Canadians tend not to use them. In fact, Malcolm Hamilton, who has a high reputation with Mercer as an actuary, has indicated that in retire

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Ian Russell

Finance committee  I will make a couple of comments, since you made reference to our brief. The first point to make, which reinforces what you've said, is that our third pillar works quite effectively: tax-assisted savings plans. I think that flexibility would be helpful. I think the Senate bankin

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Ian Russell

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Ian Russell

Finance committee  I can tell you C.D. Howe has done a study of this, looking at the comparison between the two, and I'm not convinced that's the case.

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Ian Russell

Finance committee  In other words, you're saying that their salaries more than compensate.

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Ian Russell

Finance committee  Yes, we did estimate the cost. I don't have that figure here right now, but I would be pleased to send it to you. We gave that estimate to members of this committee a year ago, I believe.

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Ian Russell

Finance committee  I think it's about $1 billion, something in that order, yes.

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Ian Russell