Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 46-60 of 61
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Industry committee  No. The statistics council learned of this at the same time the general public did.

March 8th, 2011Committee meeting

Ian McKinnon

Industry committee  In answer to the first half, I'm not aware of StatsCan's having suggested or designed anything like this in the past. Anything else would be pure speculation.

March 8th, 2011Committee meeting

Ian McKinnon

Industry committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. My name is Ian McKinnon. I chair the National Statistics Council. The council is the body of volunteer external advisers from across Canada appointed to advise on matters affecting Canada's statistical system. Since the announcement that the 2011 census would contain only the basic questions from the so-called short form census, later supplemented with the addition of questions on language, and that the voluntary national household survey would replace the long-form census, the council has continued to express its concern over the effect of these changes on the Canadian statistical system.

March 8th, 2011Committee meeting

Ian McKinnon

Industry committee  Let me give you a simple example. You raised the issue of aboriginals. One of the strengths of the census is that you can get micro area data. You get very small, local data. It's not just to serve individuals or to generate demand. It can also serve to help keep our institutions and service providers responsive.

August 27th, 2010Committee meeting

Ian McKinnon

Industry committee  Thank you. One of the elements that this portion of the discussions highlights for me is that it's important to look to solutions. There are very important things at stake in having the information that has been provided by the long-form census, but equally there have been issues raised such as the burden on some farmers—and I would add, not only through the census of agriculture, but farmers often get additional surveys that they need to fill out.

August 27th, 2010Committee meeting

Ian McKinnon

Industry committee  Thank you for the question. That's in fact exactly at the heart of the experiment that the United States conducted. We get a given percentage of response—in their case, in the low nineties—from a mandatory census. What percentage would we get in response to what's called the “American community survey” if it were on a voluntary basis but we explained the purposes and strongly encouraged people to respond?

August 27th, 2010Committee meeting

Ian McKinnon

Industry committee  Part of the materials that accompany the census and early statements on it ask people for a telephone number, in part to clarify with people answers that are not understood by Statistics Canada. I'm sure that it was in pursuit of clarifying what the person's intent and meaning was that such a call would originate.

August 27th, 2010Committee meeting

Ian McKinnon

Industry committee  Thank you, Monsieur Cardin. I would like to make several observations. The first is that I agree wholeheartedly that the information that comes from the census underpins and supports fact-based decision-making and discussion. It doesn't guide one towards a particular policy output, but it means that when you make your decisions you analyze the information and you are basing them on fact.

August 27th, 2010Committee meeting

Ian McKinnon

August 27th, 2010Committee meeting

Ian McKinnon

Industry committee  I look at it in a similar way to Michael. To me, it's what is the cost or burden to the individual and what is the benefit that the individual or his or her family derives. The burden may be a bit less, especially if you're bitterly opposed to answering some questions. On the other hand, the benefits drop dramatically under this circumstance.

August 27th, 2010Committee meeting

Ian McKinnon

Industry committee  Although I won't speak specifically on behalf of Statistics Canada, I know of no instance in the last 40 or 50 years in which individual census returns have been revealed either to another agency of government or to a business, a researcher, or the public.

August 27th, 2010Committee meeting

Ian McKinnon

Industry committee  I would add several things to that, but first to compliment the United States on the mechanism. They were looking at the issue of moving away from a mandatory census, or portion of the census, so they tested it. They took several years and got very serious about testing. Their conclusions were as follows.

August 27th, 2010Committee meeting

Ian McKinnon

Industry committee  Certainly, Monsieur Bouchard. The fundamental issue is what is called “response bias”. People who respond to voluntary surveys are, by their nature, different from those who do not. Those who do not are often more time pressed. They are people who sometimes feel marginalized within society.

August 27th, 2010Committee meeting

Ian McKinnon

Industry committee  If one changes to a voluntary form, given the absence of benchmarks, first, you have no way of confirming the accuracy, and one of the real dilemmas is that if you have bias, sample self-selection bias, increasing the number of people you talk to does nothing to solve those bias problems.

August 27th, 2010Committee meeting

Ian McKinnon

Industry committee  Thank you, Mr. Garneau. One of the most critical things the long-form census provides is small-area information. It's fine to talk to Canadians about the abstract and the importance of the labour force survey tackling questions such as efficiency in our economy, but the biggest impact on individuals is in terms of the services that are directly provided to them.

August 27th, 2010Committee meeting

Ian McKinnon