Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Natural Resources committee I think if we look at the experience in what are called mass torts, governments have reacted by establishing administrative claims tribunals because they're efficient and they're equitable in terms of their ability to bring claims together and deal with them as a group as opposed to a court, which may deal with claims on a first come, first served basis.
December 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Dave McCauley
Natural Resources committee By virtue of clause 28, the workers will still have access to whatever employee scheme of compensation or pension plan, etc., that exists for them.
December 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Dave McCauley
Natural Resources committee What the act does is preserve all those forms of agreements, all those pension plans, all those schemes of health insurance. What this provision does is say that although we are providing a separate and special avenue for victims to obtain compensation, recognize that all of these normal contractual agreements between individuals and their health insurance provider, or their pension provider, or other forms of insurance still exist.
December 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Dave McCauley
Natural Resources committee That's right.
December 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Dave McCauley
Natural Resources committee I think there are various considerations related to why the insurers will not provide the coverage.
December 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Dave McCauley
Natural Resources committee The 30-year limitation period--and I think we've covered that area already--addresses bodily injury.
December 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Dave McCauley
Natural Resources committee After 10 years.
December 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Dave McCauley
Natural Resources committee Between 10 and 30 years would be compensable through the reinsurance account.
December 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Dave McCauley
Natural Resources committee That's correct. Claims made beyond 10 years, relating to bodily injury, would fall under this reinsurance regime, and this is similar to legislation internationally, under which it's up to public funds to provide this additional coverage.
December 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Dave McCauley
Natural Resources committee The liability limit is fixed at $650 million.
December 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Dave McCauley
Natural Resources committee No, they don't. There's a $650 million limit, and the $650 million covers any claims within the period prescribed by the legislation.
December 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Dave McCauley
Natural Resources committee That's right. It's $650 million unless the government appropriates additional funds. The legislation establishes $650 million as the limit.
December 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Dave McCauley
Natural Resources committee Reinsurance is a component of the $650 million. The actual payments by either insurers or the government will not exceed $650 million.
December 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Dave McCauley
December 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Dave McCauley
Natural Resources committee It's complicated. If we're looking at the issue of damages or injury beyond 10 years, between 10 and 30 years, this is ahead of damage that is provided through reinsurance. That reinsurance is provided by the federal government. The limit of liability is $650 million. That's the total liability.
December 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Dave McCauley