Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 138751-138765 of 140359
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Gun Control   control provisions will apply to Indians living in self-governed areas of Canada. Will the Minister of Justice today clear the air and tell this House if the government indeed is considering special firearms provisions for Canadian Indians?

December 9th, 1994House debate

Dick HarrisReform

Gun Control   hours apart. It became clear to me, as it should be to all of us, that the universal principles in their application to such communities must be flexible. We are not proposing special legislation but flexibility in the application of universal principles to the reality of local

December 9th, 1994House debate

Allan RockLiberal

Gun Control   in mind I would be happy to discuss it. I can say there is a handgun which is specially registered. A .22-.32 calibre interchangeable barrel is used in international competition. We have already made it clear that firearm will be permissible because it is indeed used in that sort

December 9th, 1994House debate

Allan RockLiberal

Draft Bill On Quebec Sovereignty   question: Do you want to separate from Canada, yes or no? Not more than two lines, and the answer will be clear: Canada will win!

December 9th, 1994House debate

Jean ChrétienLiberal

Criminal Code   in the new year will not prevent farmers and ranchers, hunters or target shooters from using their firearms for recreational pursuits, in the case of ranchers for predatory control purposes. The minister has made this very clear during his extensive discussions and consultations

December 8th, 1994House debate

Mary ClancyLiberal

Criminal Code  . Section 745 was part of Bill C-84 and this bill also abolished capital punishment and established two categories of murder, first and second degree. Both categories of this horrendous crime carry minimum sentences of life imprisonment. Let me be clear. When Reformers and millions

December 8th, 1994House debate

Dick HarrisReform

Supply   Act, which is the authority on which all referendums and plebiscites are held in Quebec, it is clear that there have to be two parties: a yes and a no side. Is that democracy? The so-called democracy that we are being offered in that draft bill? Where are the two parties? Clause 1

December 8th, 1994House debate

Nick DiscepolaLiberal

Supply   it is to discuss the draft bill that was introduced by the Quebec government and that sets forth a clear and responsible process which will let Quebecers from every walk of life take part in the debate on this plan for Quebec's constitutional future. To my knowledge, this is a unique process. I

December 8th, 1994House debate

Maud DebienBloc

Supply   clear that I made no attack on the people of Quebec, whom I respect. My remarks were directed at the Government of Quebec and the Bloc Quebecois. Neither the Parti Quebecois nor the Bloc Quebecois is one and the same as the people of Quebec, although sometimes those members believe

December 8th, 1994House debate

Warren AllmandLiberal

Customs Brokers   they clear through customs. Given the very negative impact of that decision on the existence of small customs brokers, does the Minister of National Revenue intend to answer their demands in the near future?

December 8th, 1994House debate

Ghislain LebelBloc

Shipbuilding   through a clear, transparent, open bidding process.

December 8th, 1994House debate

John ManleyLiberal

Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency   in providing venture capital to businesses, a function already performed by the Federal Business Development Bank. Can the minister explain how this move will serve to level the playing field for businesses in Atlantic Canada when it is clear to everyone that taxpayers' dollars

December 8th, 1994House debate

Randy WhiteReform

Mil Davie Shipyard  . The Canada-Newfoundland Board, the Minister of Natural Resources and the Prime Minister have all admitted that. The Hibernia consortium has itself ignored the Prime Minister's directive by flatly refusing to review its decision. How can the Prime Minister explain that, despite the clear

December 8th, 1994House debate

Maurice GodinBloc

Income Tax   Canadians. All three parties made an effort to put forward their own ideas. On behalf of the minister, I would like to also thank the other two parties for putting forward their ideas. The Minister of Finance has made it quite clear that during this process we will not be commenting

December 8th, 1994House debate

David WalkerLiberal

Draft Bill On Quebec Sovereignty   that we do not want trickery; we want the truth, a clear, short, unambiguous question: Do you, in Quebec, want to separate from Canada, yes or no? It is as simple as that.

December 8th, 1994House debate

Jean ChrétienLiberal