Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1441-1455 of 1557
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Later I will give you a legal interpretation of that issue. However, one must not forget that the results are posted on Elections Canada's website as soon as they are available. Furthermore, we consistently update those results, which the candidates can use. I understand the implications of your question and later I will give you a more specific answer.

April 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  The reason there has not been prosecution is that there's no complaint that could be justified. There are a lot of perception issues and rumours, and people talk about this type of thing occurring.

April 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I'll verify that and come back to the committee. It's my belief that it is not the case that there's been a successful prosecution. What we did on the side is agree with Mr. Proulx that we would be providing this committee with an answer about the question he had raised. What I find interesting in your comments is that you could have provided your ID three times, so why is going to be useful to provide the ID at the polls?

April 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  The statute says that you don't need to. If members of Parliament want to change the statute and require ID, then members of Parliament will have to change the law. But you can't look to me to mandate it, if it's not in the law.

April 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I'm not ready to indicate support today. I think it has to be discussed. There's the whole thrust of the legislation, which has existed since 1920 in this respect. Before we change that, I think people should be aware that the change would be a major one. There is also a whole slew of measures that do exist to ensure the integrity of the process.

April 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I think that's fair. We can bring Mr. Kingsley back at another time and get into an in-depth discussion when you have had an opportunity to prepare for this. Your colleagues may want to note that you've taken all their time. Go ahead, please, Ms.

April 27th, 2006Committee meeting

The ChairConservative

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Mr. Kingsley, it is always a pleasure to see you again. I would like to come back to the way returning officers are appointed, but before that, I would like to tell you about something that happened in my riding during the last election.

April 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Pauline PicardBloc

Procedure and House Affairs committee  First, thank you for once again raising the issue of returning officers, an issue which has consistently been the subject of my recommendations since I have held my position. I spoke about this in 1990, the year I was appointed, before the royal commission that was considering this issue.

April 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I have just a short comment, and then I'll yield to my colleagues. Mr. Kingsley, I do have to express some frank skepticism that the kinds of things that I and others talked about, specifically mine, happened only in Edmonton Centre. If they do happen only in Edmonton Centre, then the people of Edmonton Centre and other people need to be shocked for an entirely different reason, which I won't go into.

April 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Laurie HawnConservative

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Okay. With respect to my comment on Edmonton Centre, what I attempted to say was that this happened to the largest extent in Edmonton Centre. I'm not going to say that this happened only in Edmonton Centre. A few other ridings come to mind, in which we had a problem with public buildings being listed as residential addresses.

April 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Sir, what I don't understand is how you can go to fifteen different polls when you have the same address. Your poll is tied to your address.

April 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I would like that name, because under the statute there is a seven-year limitation for any infraction committed during the 2004 general election. So I definitely need that name. The issue that you're raising, which is one of ID at the polls, is one that perhaps we could be discussing at greater length, because doing so could take a long time this morning.

April 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  It is thicker than that.

April 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Mr. Kingsley, I realize you did not decide or will not decide on the following issue, but I would like to know what you think about the section in your report dealing with access to multi-residential buildings, to gated communities and other such places.

April 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Marcel ProulxLiberal

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Mr. Chairman, I will try to answer very briefly. As far as removing the names of people who have changed addresses from the electoral lists is concerned, once in a while in the last six years, I know that we have taken measures to ensure that when a person registers on the electoral list during an election, that person is asked wether anyone would have lived in their place of residence previously.

April 27th, 2006Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Kingsley