Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 4846-4860 of 5834
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Environment committee  Thank you, and so moved, Mr. Chair.

May 3rd, 2007Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  Yes, I was just going to respond to Mr. Regan. What was handed out is the proposed new bill, and clause 5 will become clause 2.2, and clause 6 will become clause 5, and clause 7 will become clause 6.

May 3rd, 2007Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  I have one quick question. We're in support of what's being proposed here. Procedurally, can we change our amendment by removing proposed clause 5 so that it's not being duplicated and we don't have to throw out the whole motion? Is that okay?

May 3rd, 2007Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  That's fine. Thank you so much. (Amendment agreed to) (On clause 3--Regulations--Food and Drugs Act)

May 3rd, 2007Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  Chair, it will be not G-7, but G-7.1.

May 3rd, 2007Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

May 3rd, 2007Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  Thank you, Chair. We want to have a language that is the best proper legal language, so perhaps I could ask the department which of these two will--

May 3rd, 2007Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  I would agree, Chair, but you can't say the same thing twice within the bill and get under the 7.1, the proposed clause 5, under our amendment 7.1. It deals with the same thing, so which is the better text?

May 3rd, 2007Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  That's my question.

May 3rd, 2007Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  Thank you, Chair. I was looking for that, so thank you for helping me. Can I then ask the department to explain what the difference is between the amendment on page 7.1 and the NDP amendment?

May 3rd, 2007Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  I so move, Mr. Chair.

May 3rd, 2007Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

May 3rd, 2007Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  Thank you. I have a quick question for Mr. Cullen, through you. On paragraph 6(c), it deals with what you just mentioned regarding labelling. It would be required, within 24 months after coming into force, that there would be labelling on medical devices that contain DEHP. Woul

May 3rd, 2007Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  As a brief comment, I apologize to Mr. Bigras for not consulting him. The reality is that there just was not time. Comments that he made last Tuesday and before that were incorporated into the consensus. They were very much considered, and I appreciate his commitment to dealing w

May 3rd, 2007Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

May 3rd, 2007Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative