Ethics  , but 29 times to the hard-line, separatist Québec solidaire. For Canadians to trust and believe in that party, they need to know that party believes in Canada. Would the member confirm if he is now a federalist?

Election Expenses   keeps giving to the separatists. He could put the whole matter to rest by simply rising and saying that he is a federalist and he believes in a united Canada. Why will he not just do that?

Election Expenses   up, though, about a member of the official opposition donating 29 times to the hardest line separatist party in Quebec. It is a very simple question but a very important one. Does he believe in a united Canada? Is he a federalist?

Port of Montreal  Mr. Speaker, the problem is not that he donated 29 times to the separatists, including six times this year while he was ostensibly a paid-up member of the NDP caucus. The problem is that he cannot stand up in the House of Commons, even now, and say that he rejects separation

Port of Montreal  Mr. Speaker, apparently my hon. friend is following the old rule: when in trouble, yell. That is exactly what he has done. I simply ask, given that the member has donated 29 times to a separatist party, why can he not do what literally every member of this caucus is prepared

Port of Montreal  Mr. Speaker, the member is the gift who just keeps on giving. In fact, he not only gave once, he gave 29 times to the separatist Québec solidaire. Canadians are very forgiving people. They can forgive someone who makes a mistake or makes the same mistake 29 times, but what

Port of Montreal  Mr. Speaker, I am not sure if the member heard, but the gentleman in question did not get the post and we did not have the power to offer it to him. It is no wonder that NDP members would try to distract from the issues before the House. One of them gives money to a separatist

Port of Montreal   he gave money to the hardest line separatist party in Quebec and its predecessor party, a party that says in its declaration of principles that Québec solidaire opts for sovereignty, and he now refuses to renounce those donations and stand up for Canada. He should answer that.

Unions   of unions without having to pay for them. What benefits? Do federal public servants benefit when their union backs separatist parties that would destroy federal jobs? Does a Jewish worker benefit when his union spends money on an Israel boycott? I do not see the benefits

Ethics   of principles that “Québec Solidaire Opts for...Sovereignty”. It is the hardest line separatist party in Quebec. The hon. member even gave donations to this party while he sat in the federal caucus of a supposedly federal party. I am simply asking him to stand up and say that he no longer

Ethics  Mr. Speaker, the hon. member is still making baseless allegations. The Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister did his job properly and we support him. He has already given the information to Elections Canada. The member opposite made donations to an openly separatist

Election Spending   donated to the hardest line separatist party in the country while sitting in the federal Parliament of Canada proposing himself as a future cabinet minister. If one wants to be minister in the Government of Canada, one must start by first believing in Canada. That is not done