Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Government Operations committee If it is agreeable to Mr. Angus, instead of adding something on the subamendment we would take off what is already in the first motion. In English it would read: That this committee look into whether the unprecedented decision taken by the former Treasury Board President during
February 5th, 2008Committee meeting
The Clerk of the Committee
Government Operations committee There has been some discussion lately about the sub judice aspect of things, and there is no fixed decision on that. The usual provision would be to be careful, but some scholars would propose that the rule does not restrict members from getting into those matters with some cau
February 5th, 2008Committee meeting
The Clerk
Government Operations committee The January 25 motion was passed at meeting 9, a week ago.
February 7th, 2008Committee meeting
The Clerk of the Committee
Government Operations committee That is correct. It was passed at meeting 9, in January, that is.
February 12th, 2008Committee meeting
The Clerk
Government Operations committee That is correct, that is what the motion indicated.
February 12th, 2008Committee meeting
The Clerk
Government Operations committee No, it was not written into the motion like that, but, during the discussions, we mentioned three meetings on the subject.
February 12th, 2008Committee meeting
The Clerk
Government Operations committee As you just said, there are a large number of motions. But they have been put in a certain order. That is why, on Thursday, we are going to look at the federal government's real estate plan, with Ms. Michèle Demers, from the Professional Institute of the Public Service, as a witn
February 12th, 2008Committee meeting
The Clerk of the Committee
Government Operations committee No, it was not the one about Gomery, it was Mr. Holland's
February 12th, 2008Committee meeting
The Clerk
Government Operations committee It reads as follows: that the motion be amended by replacing the words "6 meetings" with the words "5 meetings" and everything that follows by: February 14: political interference by the Prime Minister's office February 26: light rail transit project February 28: governor in c
February 12th, 2008Committee meeting
The Clerk
Government Operations committee Yes, for the next five meetings. (Motion as amended agreed to)
February 12th, 2008Committee meeting
The Clerk
Government Operations committee Thank you, Madam Chair. As soon as I got back to my office, I made some telephone calls to reach all the witnesses appearing on the list of the adopted motion. The calls were made between 11:34 a.m. and 12:09 p.m. on Tuesday. However, the answers were slow in coming in some case
February 14th, 2008Committee meeting
The Clerk of the Committee
Government Operations committee We can introduce a motion. I've tried to stick to the spirit of the motion, even though I could not comply with it to the letter. Today's meeting was scheduled following the five meetings; it will be held today. The meeting of the 26th would concern light rail, as provided in the
February 14th, 2008Committee meeting
The Clerk
Government Operations committee It's an assignation à comparaître.
February 14th, 2008Committee meeting
The Clerk
Government Operations committee In order, Mr. Dimitri Soudas could not be present today for family reasons that I thought were quite legitimate. As to February 28, he told me he might be available if the other witnesses were present. Mr. Housakos, whom I finally reached late yesterday afternoon, first wanted to
February 14th, 2008Committee meeting
The Clerk
Government Operations committee No. I sensed a certain reluctance on the first day, which quickly faded yesterday, following articles that appeared in the newspapers. People understood that the committee's request was serious. The first impression quickly dissipated. As I said, there's only Minister Fortier for
February 14th, 2008Committee meeting
The Clerk