Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 88
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Information & Ethics committee  Thank you. I am going to start in French, but I am going to change to English because for more complicated things like the protection of personal privacy, it is easier for me to speak in English. I also have jet lag. That's an additional good reason. I feel I am almost twice a

May 8th, 2008Committee meeting

Prof. David Flaherty

Information & Ethics committee  When you're doing the privacy risk management strategy, the first thing you have to have is a law. When they first introduced the freedom of information law in Ontario, my comment to the media around 1983 or 1984 was that I thought any law was better than no law until I saw thi

May 8th, 2008Committee meeting

Prof. David Flaherty

Information & Ethics committee  If my successor, David Loukidelis, who appeared before you on PIPEDA last year, were here—and of course he told me what to say when I was here, so I have to remember all the things he told me to say, not particularly on this question—he would be talking about the need for the Bri

May 8th, 2008Committee meeting

Prof. David Flaherty

Information & Ethics committee  You don't want to do anything in the way of European data protection. It's so complicated. It's so rule-bound. It's inspired by the European directive. It's very legalistic. It deals primarily with law rather than practice. My interest is in policy. What happens in practice? In

May 8th, 2008Committee meeting

Prof. David Flaherty

May 8th, 2008Committee meeting

Prof. David Flaherty

Information & Ethics committee  No, but when I read them this morning, I marked recommendations 1 to 4 and 9, because I found them more substantial than recommendations 5 to 8.

May 8th, 2008Committee meeting

Prof. David Flaherty

Information & Ethics committee  I'm a little tired of transported data flows, because the Open and Shut report in 1987 recommended that we should really be studying transported data flows of personal information, and nothing much was done about it. They commissioned a study, which I didn't get to do. A bunch of

May 8th, 2008Committee meeting

Prof. David Flaherty

May 8th, 2008Committee meeting

Prof. David Flaherty

Information & Ethics committee  But it is not just a matter of saying yes, is it?

May 8th, 2008Committee meeting

Prof. David Flaherty

Information & Ethics committee  I agree with all ten recommendations.

May 8th, 2008Committee meeting

Prof. David Flaherty

May 8th, 2008Committee meeting

Prof. David Flaherty

May 8th, 2008Committee meeting

Prof. David Flaherty

Information & Ethics committee  It's too easy to not let the Privacy Commissioner know what's going on. I'm being oratorical to make points, and I'm exaggerating a little bit to make points. It's not as if nobody listens to the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, but think of how many times she's done major repor

May 8th, 2008Committee meeting

Prof. David Flaherty

Information & Ethics committee  My point is you have to be looking forward, not backwards, as to what you need, and that's where the order-making power is very significant.

May 8th, 2008Committee meeting

Prof. David Flaherty

Information & Ethics committee  I was dreaming about this morning's appearance. Maybe it was a nightmare, and I didn't record it properly.

May 8th, 2008Committee meeting

Prof. David Flaherty