Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 18
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Justice committee  Thank you. Good afternoon. My name is Phil Downes. I bring greetings to you on behalf of my colleague Bill Trudell, who is the chair of the Canadian Council of Criminal Defence Lawyers and who is known I think to many of you. We are once again extremely honoured to have the oppo

February 23rd, 2009Committee meeting

Phil Downes

Justice committee  Thank you very much. Let me just say that targeting repeat offenders and changing behaviours go well beyond the criminal justice system. We think that creative education has been shown to be the way to go and will do far more to solve the problems you're looking at than will som

February 23rd, 2009Committee meeting

Phil Downes

Justice committee  I didn't mean at all to give the impression that we don't think there's significance to that choice. All I'm saying is that for the purposes of my submission to this committee.... There are many people who can tell you about the research on blood alcohol levels, the effects in ot

February 23rd, 2009Committee meeting

Phil Downes

Justice committee  Again, I don't want to stray outside of our particular expertise, but I think you're absolutely right. They work. They have the deterrent effect, and they prevent people, especially repeat offenders, from drinking and driving.

February 23rd, 2009Committee meeting

Phil Downes

Justice committee  Our representative in the Yukon, whom I spoke with just this morning, tells me that it's $500 to install and then you have to pay a $100 monthly fee. The $500 may be a little on the low side; I've heard it's as much as $1,500.

February 23rd, 2009Committee meeting

Phil Downes

Justice committee  You're referring to the legislation that to a certain extent effectively removed what was called the Carter defence.

February 23rd, 2009Committee meeting

Phil Downes

Justice committee  It's in a variety of stages. Essentially it's being challenged at the trial level. For example, in Ontario we now have dozens of different trial decisions speaking to whether or not that legislation should be applied retrospectively or on a forward basis. It's a patchwork quilt.

February 23rd, 2009Committee meeting

Phil Downes

Justice committee  Yes, I would.... I don't mean to say it doesn't matter, because it does matter. I'm just saying that for our purposes we wanted to talk about what the implications would be. So yes, clearly, depending on whether it's a provincial scheme or Criminal Code consequences, we're giving

February 23rd, 2009Committee meeting

Phil Downes

Justice committee  Interestingly, the big deal for the clients, though, is when can they not drive. In many ways, they don't care too much about the cost, even the legal fees or the fines. The big issues are for how long are they not going to be able to drive and the stigma of it. We find that thos

February 23rd, 2009Committee meeting

Phil Downes

Justice committee  I was a crown prosecutor for eight years and I saw and spoke to those victims. So I know exactly what you're saying, sir. I would hope my submissions to you today reflect our genuine concern to stop repeat drinking and driving while at the same time not abandoning our charter and

February 23rd, 2009Committee meeting

Phil Downes

Justice committee  I think we sort of have it right now, and I think that 0.05 is dealt with provincially so there are consequences for it.

February 23rd, 2009Committee meeting

Phil Downes

Justice committee  I think we've sort of--

February 23rd, 2009Committee meeting

Phil Downes

Justice committee  Yes, in terms of your last assertion. Yes, it would be if it were applied nationally through the Criminal Code. We don't really have a position on whether the provinces should have identical legislation in highway traffic act legislation, so in that sense we don't see it as an

February 23rd, 2009Committee meeting

Phil Downes

Justice committee  I wouldn't take that position. I don't think our organization would take that position. Clearly, impaired operation, particularly when it causes bodily harm or death, particularly when it's a repeat offender or somebody who's been put on notice or somebody who has refused treatme

February 23rd, 2009Committee meeting

Phil Downes

Justice committee  I agree with you.

February 23rd, 2009Committee meeting

Phil Downes