Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
National Defence committee Thanks, Paul. I'm going to talk a little about the Chicago summit, the main points that are going to come up, and some implications for Canada as a result of that. It's really important that we keep in mind the last three things Paul talked about. One is the landscape in which
May 15th, 2012Committee meeting
George Petrolekas
National Defence committee NATO's boundaries end at the western shores of Canada and the United States. You never see any discussion about the Pacific dimension of NATO. It always seems to end on the western shores of France. That's one of the things we need to raise. With respect to article 5, and from a
May 15th, 2012Committee meeting
George Petrolekas
National Defence committee We agree, and it's not a sequential or a linear series of steps, and one isn't to the exclusion of the other, so let me just clarify that really quickly. Yes, there are partnerships that NATO has established. There are partnerships for peace. There were certainly partnerships th
May 15th, 2012Committee meeting
George Petrolekas
National Defence committee Sorry, the shift—
May 15th, 2012Committee meeting
George Petrolekas
National Defence committee I think that's exactly one of the things that we've described as things that we are seeing as a symptom of global financial crises. It is very hard, for example, if you're the Greek MOD at this moment to justify your 130-person Role 3 hospital in Kabul when people in your own str
May 15th, 2012Committee meeting
George Petrolekas
National Defence committee There are a couple of parts to that. I think there's absolutely a belief that we can better things. I recall one time walking outside of Bagram and watching a farmer trying to rebuild his farm. I thought, this is something really worth backing. The guy is sweating, working in the
May 15th, 2012Committee meeting
George Petrolekas
National Defence committee I think for the most part successive Canadian governments have treated the Arctic as Canadian inland waters and have not necessarily welcomed NATO involvement specifically in the Arctic, as we ourselves try to wade through a number of issues. I'll give you an example from a que
May 15th, 2012Committee meeting
George Petrolekas
National Defence committee You articulated some of the threats. You mentioned cyber, and that is one domain that has not been developed, either from a policy standpoint or an understanding of what that actually means. When you think that the New York Stock Exchange can fluctuate in value close to 7% in one
May 15th, 2012Committee meeting
George Petrolekas
National Defence committee There was a symptoms analysis. I'll add that a member of your committee knows more about Afghanistan than anyone else in Canada. It's the former ambassador, Mr. Alexander. Allow me to add a few comments. It's obvious that the Afghan state needs financial help, but beyond that,
May 15th, 2012Committee meeting
George Petrolekas
National Defence committee According to our Canadian, British, and U.S. partners, as well as other NATO countries, the short answer is yes. Yes, judging from what we have seen, the Afghan army will still need military support.
May 15th, 2012Committee meeting
George Petrolekas
National Defence committee There are two different things we're talking about. I hope we're not confusing them. The very first thing we said was that there is a hierarchy of national interests. That has become more defined in the environment that we're living in—that environment being influenced by public
May 15th, 2012Committee meeting
George Petrolekas
National Defence committee They are, in fact, focusing us in those particular areas. One other thing, just to clarify, is that we did talk in the strategic outlook paper in general terms about Canada and Canada's interests, but there are also limitations when we're talking about the NATO strategic concep
May 15th, 2012Committee meeting
George Petrolekas
National Defence committee It includes parts of the land mass where there are areas of interest. Here is an example. The NATO Response Force was designed in 2001 to provide NATO an expeditionary capability and to intervene in a series of places. Haiti, after the earthquake, had absolutely no NATO involve
May 15th, 2012Committee meeting
George Petrolekas
National Defence committee No. The very first step is to identify that it is an issue. The second step is to flag that to our diplomatic intervention to try to move NATO to recognize that it does have interests collectively beyond its borders, which it actually mentions in the strategic concept. It artic
May 15th, 2012Committee meeting
George Petrolekas
National Defence committee I try to retain some optimism. It did take 10 years, but there is now a heavy airlift capability in NATO stationed in Hungary, where they bought C-17s, something that was identified—that the alliance as a whole requires heavy airlift. The AGS program seems to be moving along, aft
May 15th, 2012Committee meeting
George Petrolekas