Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 17
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Finance committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the committee, for your invitation. I am an assistant professor of political management at Kroeger College, Carleton University. My remarks today reflect my views based on my research on social policy and household financial behaviour. I'm

October 21st, 2014Committee meeting

Professor Jennifer Robson

Finance committee  I think the short answer to that is probably nothing. If you don't have anyone to split your income with, then you get no benefit out of income splitting. I'm not exactly sure where the estimate of 14% of households might benefit comes from.

October 21st, 2014Committee meeting

Prof. Jennifer Robson

Finance committee  There are about 9.4 million families of two or more people. Of those, about 672,000 are single male earners, and they have a median income of about $40,000. Income splitting won't do anything for them either, because they're already in the lower tax bracket. There is nowhere furt

October 21st, 2014Committee meeting

Prof. Jennifer Robson

Finance committee  If you compare and contrast, for example, a family with two income earners, both making $40,000 for a combined family income of about $80,000, income splitting leads to about a $5,000 federal—federal alone—tax cut for them. This is my back-of-the-envelope calculation.

October 21st, 2014Committee meeting

Prof. Jennifer Robson

Finance committee  For the couple making $40,000— Sorry, for a one-income earner family—

October 21st, 2014Committee meeting

Prof. Jennifer Robson

Finance committee  They get nothing out of income splitting either because they're already both in the lowest tax bracket. But if you compare to one-income earners making $80,000, they would benefit.

October 21st, 2014Committee meeting

Prof. Jennifer Robson

Finance committee  Even within that target, you have to have sufficient taxable income for that earner to be able to drop a bracket or more.

October 21st, 2014Committee meeting

Prof. Jennifer Robson

October 21st, 2014Committee meeting

Prof. Jennifer Robson

October 21st, 2014Committee meeting

Prof. Jennifer Robson

Finance committee  Yes, because of the way that our progressive income tax system works.

October 21st, 2014Committee meeting

Prof. Jennifer Robson

Finance committee  I think perhaps I'll turn to Frances.

October 21st, 2014Committee meeting

Prof. Jennifer Robson

Finance committee  First of all, I'd like to say that I am pleased that child care is back in terms of public policy debate. I think that's an important step in the right direction. I think what concerns me is that if we try to overlay a universal flat fee system on top of the existing universal c

October 21st, 2014Committee meeting

Prof. Jennifer Robson

Finance committee  The full-profit tax preparers will be brought into CRA's new compliance scheme, a new regulatory mechanism. I think the agency is doing the right thing in focusing on education. Monitoring the performance of those paid tax preparers and providing those additional kinds of remedia

October 21st, 2014Committee meeting

Prof. Jennifer Robson

Finance committee  That's based on research done by Tammy Schirle, who has found that for the families who are receiving the UCCB, it actually leads to a decline in the workforce participation of women in those families. I think there's some fuzziness about that particular program, frankly. Is it i

October 21st, 2014Committee meeting

Prof. Jennifer Robson

Finance committee  There are jurisdictions. I think one of the other witnesses named a few. I'll speak very briefly about two very short examples.

October 21st, 2014Committee meeting

Prof. Jennifer Robson