Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 37
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Safety committee  No, and I really wouldn't want to take a guess at that.

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Susan Pollak

Public Safety committee  Yes, it could do.

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Susan Pollak

Public Safety committee  I believe that after we completed the review of Maher Arar—I may be out of sync here, but my memory tells me—we did a broader review of foreign intelligence-sharing arrangements.

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Susan Pollak

Public Safety committee  I would hope so. Yes, that is exactly what I'm saying.

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Susan Pollak

Public Safety committee  I will respond very quickly by repeating what the former director of CSIS said, which is that they never accept any information at face value, whatever its origins, without corroborating it from other sources. That really is the role of CSIS to do that, and it's not for us to ass

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Susan Pollak

Public Safety committee  Absolutely, and in fact I'd like to give you a few examples.

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Susan Pollak

Public Safety committee  In the case of Maher Arar, we launched a review. It was not a complaint; it was exactly what you're talking about. Of our own motion, we launched a review inside SIRC of CSIS's role in the matter of Maher Arar months before the government established the commission of inquiry. Ou

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Susan Pollak

Public Safety committee  We're doing it with Mr. Khadr, too, as I just mentioned to your colleague.

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Susan Pollak

Public Safety committee  We don't call these investigations, because unlike our complaints we don't necessarily call witnesses or subpoena people. It's a different process, but we do still have the full access to all of CSIS's documents, including all of the exchanges of information they've had with othe

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Susan Pollak

Public Safety committee  I don't want to pre-empt the work of the committee. You may not have been aware that we did announce some months ago that we were launching a review of CSIS's involvement in the matter of Mr. Khadr. We've kept an eye on the situation for a number of years now. The videos you have

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Susan Pollak

Public Safety committee  It's in process, so we expect it to be completed within this year's reporting cycle. It would therefore appear in the next annual report.

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Susan Pollak

Public Safety committee  The mandate of CSIS is to investigate threats to Canada's security. We live in a big world with a lot of terrorist threats that don't respect borders and that move around quite freely. In such a world, it's very important that our security intelligence service enter into arrangem

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Susan Pollak

Public Safety committee  It's going to be hard for me to cast back. There is one example that comes to mind of a recommendation we made repeatedly over a number of years through our investigations of complaints. I'll let Ms. Roussel tell you what the disposition of that recommendation was and how we fina

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Susan Pollak

Public Safety committee  Because we're a review body, we're not there on the ground day to day directing the operations of the service. That is the responsibility of the director and his staff. We try to keep our recommendations at a general level so the service can determine what makes the most sense in

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Susan Pollak

Public Safety committee  I'm not sure if I understand the last part of the question. What do you mean by “significantly different”?

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Susan Pollak