Finance committee  When are you doing clause-by-clause, Mr. Chair?

Finance committee  Okay.

Finance committee  Right now, we have to be moving forward and implementing this, so the companies are in a situation where—

Finance committee  It's a very good question. First of all, when it was introduced in the legislation, there was no costing required because it was a legislative amendment, in 2014. When we went through the regulatory process, we were aligning with the U.S. under the regulatory co-operation counci

Finance committee  Yes, that is correct.

Finance committee  Thank you very much.

Finance committee  Currently we have to provide our safety data sheets, which I think the clerk has shared with all of you, and we have to retain those in a database. This additional request has evolved over the course of the implementation of the Hazardous Products Act and its regulations. Just

Finance committee  Yes.

Finance committee  That's an evolving narrative, as well.

Finance committee  First of all, we had the officials speak to us and say it's a legibility issue. We've never had this requirement previously, and it was in 2014 that it was put in. It was illegibility. Well, then, if it's legibility, could you please clarify what that means? Then we moved into, “

Finance committee  I just wanted to highlight that CCSPA has been very engaged in the regulatory modernization agenda since it was first announced and we did provide comments to the minister, Scott Brison, at the time. We provided addendums and then an addendum with a costing on this particular iss

Finance committee  Thank you for the question. As I mentioned in my comments, we are very excited about the opportunities with an annual regulatory modernization bill. The fact that the first one has been incorporated into this bill is why we're here today. We are striving to deliver against the

Finance committee  Good morning, Mr. Chair and members of Parliament. It's a pleasure to be here today to provide our proposal for your consideration and to include in the clause-by-clause consideration of Bill C-97. My name is Shannon Coombs and I'm the President of the Canadian Consumer Speciali

International Trade committee  It was that we needed just a general exemption, but it didn't relate back to what we consider.... In the regulations there is already a provision in place, under section 117, that allows the creation of regulations for import purposes. We thought that because they have to amend

International Trade committee  I think as Pierre pointed out, they were trying to make everyone happy with the definition. The current definition has that piece about “required by the act or the regulation” so it's very specific. It goes back to the regulations we have for a label. It is a legal entity. It's i