Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 106-120 of 248
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  In addressing this broad suite of issues that you described, I'll suggest three things Environment Canada is engaged in and intends to remain engaged in. First of all, with respect to specific issues on specific reserves, in Environment Canada we see ourselves playing a supporti

December 13th, 2011Committee meeting

John Moffet

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  Let me commit to try to find out where the response is to your letter. And yes, the department across all of its programs has taken a look at our obligations with respect to what's known as “duty to consult”. The particular court case applied to the Species at Risk Act, but acr

December 13th, 2011Committee meeting

John Moffet

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  Although they have been somewhat amended, you're right that these provisions have been in CEPA since its first incarnation in 1988. Under the current part 9 we've promulgated federal PCB regulations--the storage tank regulations I referred to. In addition to authority to develop

December 13th, 2011Committee meeting

John Moffet

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  Thank you, Chair and committee members, for taking an interest in the work of Environment Canada. In my opening remarks I'd like to address three issues. First, I'll provide a brief overview of environmental management generally in Canada. Second, I'll outline the nature of the

December 13th, 2011Committee meeting

John Moffet

Environment committee  I don't think we can speculate on the ultimate outcome of decisions that are not strictly limited to listing. Again, there are decisions as to how to implement, and of course the particular impact on forest-based communities extends beyond certain environmental statutes, and ther

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

John Moffet

Environment committee  We have to manage so that we deliver on the legal obligations and also engender partnerships. There are instances of partnerships that haven't worked out. But one of the things we're trying to bring to your attention is the way in which relationships with partners were chilled by

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

John Moffet

Environment committee  I'll try to answer that. Let me be clear that we don't have a mandate to come to you and say this part of the act is broken, or you should recommend fixing this part of the act or that part of the act. We can't do that. You've heard from witnesses. I do think, however, that we

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

John Moffet

Environment committee  At the moment the federal government has allocated across the three organizations--and it's important to emphasize that there are three, Parks Canada, Fisheries, and the Department of the Environment--approximately $100 million per year up until next spring, at which point in tim

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

John Moffet

Environment committee  There are a couple of important factors. Yes, we have invested a lot in staffing up, in developing policies, and frankly in working our way through the legislation, in learning how to prepare cabinet for listing decisions, in learning how to do recovery strategies, and fundamenta

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

John Moffet

Environment committee  Here, I'm afraid, we're getting on thin ice for officials. I think we're trying to outline for you some thematic concepts that you may want to consider. Whether that translates into specific implementation directions that we take, or indeed into some legislative reforms, those ar

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

John Moffet

Environment committee  The critical decision that triggers action under the act is listing. The Governor in Council has discretion as to whether to list a species. Once a species is listed certain steps have to be taken. For the level of effort that we provide to each step, of course there is broad dis

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

John Moffet

Environment committee  I think that's an excellent question. There are some very fundamental decisions, if you will, that the committee needs to make about the kind of advice it provides to government about the act. I think we have tried to suggest to you that in implementing the act and in the learn

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

John Moffet

Environment committee  I'll answer that question indirectly. The act does not address ownership. What the act does is establish protection of species, and that protection arrives in different ways and has different status depending on the species itself and its location. If the species is on federal la

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

John Moffet

Environment committee  I'm not sure I can directly answer your question, but I'll attempt. First, I think you're asking if we have data that enables us to understand the impact of socio-economic considerations, for example, on certain decisions. In effect, I think the best data that we have was presen

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

John Moffet

Environment committee  Can we just elaborate a little bit on that question? I appreciate you're trying to get through some questions, but the question was specifically focused on loss of habitat. Although I defer to your scientific expertise, I think it's inappropriate to characterize the issue as str

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

John Moffet