Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 367
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Transport committee  The committee always has the power to review everything pertaining to transportation. That's included in the committee's mandate.

June 11th, 2007Committee meeting

Franz Reinhardt

Transport committee  Yes. I should have said for the record, yes.

June 11th, 2007Committee meeting

Franz Reinhardt

Transport committee  We have always thought that an SMS should never conflict with other acts that already apply.

June 11th, 2007Committee meeting

Franz Reinhardt

Transport committee  There were legal opinions, I believe, and I think this committee sought a legal opinion specifically about this issue here. I got the information that HRSDC themselves said they don't want this and don't think it's necessary. They believe they have full authority with their legis

June 11th, 2007Committee meeting

Franz Reinhardt

Transport committee  No. I reassert what I told you. Part I of the Aeronautics Act states this: Except as otherwise provided by this Part, every person who contravenes a provision of this Part or any regulation, notice, order, security measure or emergency direction made under this Part is guilty o

June 11th, 2007Committee meeting

Franz Reinhardt

Transport committee  I can read it: A corporation that is convicted of an offence under this Part punishable on summary conviction is liable to a fine not exceeding one million dollars.

June 11th, 2007Committee meeting

Franz Reinhardt

Transport committee  We believe it would be very dangerous to embark upon that type of appeal mechanism. There are already very serious provisions for enforcement against people who breach any of the provisions under part 1 of the Aeronautics Act. There could be some reconvictions up to $1 million...

June 11th, 2007Committee meeting

Franz Reinhardt

Transport committee  Mr. Julian, with all due respect, the process would be for the employee to report to Transport that there is an alleged violation by an employer regarding a provision of the Aeronautics Act. Transport Canada would carry out the investigation and take action if the evidence is the

June 11th, 2007Committee meeting

Franz Reinhardt

Transport committee  I will repeat that we believe there's sufficient protection there if you use the enforcement process that's available to anybody through Transport Canada and the department. People who are not respecting the provisions of the act will be prosecuted. I don't think it's necessary

June 11th, 2007Committee meeting

Franz Reinhardt

Transport committee  Excuse me, if I may, after subsection (4), you could have a subsection (5), that would read: Information reported under the program referred to in subsection 5.395(1) may not be used against an employee to take any reprisals, including any measure that adversely affects the emp

June 11th, 2007Committee meeting

Franz Reinhardt

June 11th, 2007Committee meeting

Franz Reinhardt

Transport committee  They won't understand my handwriting, and it's a combination of....

June 11th, 2007Committee meeting

Franz Reinhardt

Transport committee  I will read it in French now, and I've got it here. “Il ne peut être fait usage de renseignements communiqués dans le cadre d'un processus visé au paragraphe 5.395(1) lorsqu'il engage une procédure disciplinaire contre [...]”

June 11th, 2007Committee meeting

Franz Reinhardt

Transport committee  “Il ne peut être fait usage [...]” If you're satisfied with the English, we can have the French completed by the end of the session here.

June 11th, 2007Committee meeting

Franz Reinhardt

Transport committee  I understand your idea, Mr. Laframboise. If you want to achieve the desired result, an amendment that might perhaps constitute the subsection (5) would be necessary. If that were the case, and if the government wanted to proceed in that manner, I would suggest that we take a few

June 11th, 2007Committee meeting

Franz Reinhardt