Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 58
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Fisheries committee  Yes, that's correct.

April 10th, 2008Committee meeting

Patricia Kell

Fisheries committee  Two departments are involved: the Parks Canada Agency and Fisheries and Oceans Canada. In the case of Parks Canada, costs will be associated with the administration of the act, that is costs supporting a program, the appraisal of lighthouses, petitions and the evaluation of proje

April 10th, 2008Committee meeting

Patricia Kell

Fisheries committee  This amendment would remove structures from the bill. The number of infrastructures that must be maintained would thus be reduced, not increased.

April 10th, 2008Committee meeting

Patricia Kell

Fisheries committee  I'll start. The challenge here is that it depends on how the criteria are set. As Mr. Hegge alluded to earlier, when we look at the different programs we have, we get different answers to that question. The national historic sites program looked at lighthouses across the coun

April 1st, 2008Committee meeting

Patricia Kell

Fisheries committee  Okay. The pointy buildings with the lights on top are what they're evaluating.

April 1st, 2008Committee meeting

Patricia Kell

Fisheries committee  I'm sorry, my data are not divided that way. But based on the information I do have, about one-third of the lighthouses they looked at were designated as recognized, which is the lower level of recognition. About 20 of them were recognized as classified, which is the higher level

April 1st, 2008Committee meeting

Patricia Kell

Fisheries committee  Clearly, in some cases, their purpose is to make the light station accessible. Presumably, once you're at the station, everything that is there is accessible to you.

April 1st, 2008Committee meeting

Patricia Kell

Fisheries committee  Are any of the light stations isolated?

April 1st, 2008Committee meeting

Patricia Kell

Fisheries committee  Certainly, yes.

April 1st, 2008Committee meeting

Patricia Kell

Fisheries committee  I think the important distinction from the heritage protection perspective is that at a particular light station you may have both things that are of heritage interest as well as other things, modern infrastructure that supports, for example, access to the things that are of heri

April 1st, 2008Committee meeting

Patricia Kell

Fisheries committee  My understanding of the reason the bill was proposed in the first place was that there was a concern that lighthouses of heritage interest were not being cared for appropriately by the federal government, yes.

April 1st, 2008Committee meeting

Patricia Kell

Fisheries committee  On a lighthouse site there may be a variety of different structures, including the main light tower. In many cases, there has been a lightkeeper's house associated with the site and in some cases also other support buildings, a fog alarm building or an oil shed in some cases. We

April 1st, 2008Committee meeting

Patricia Kell

Fisheries committee  I'm Patricia Kell, and I'm the director of policy for national historic sites at Parks Canada.

April 1st, 2008Committee meeting

Patricia Kell

Fisheries committee  I could maybe add a little bit of context. On two previous occasions the Speaker ruled that this was not a money bill, and I think that was partly because this bill was modelled on the Heritage Railway Stations Protection Act, which itself was ruled as not being a money bill. It

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Patricia Kell

Fisheries committee  Let me briefly fill you in on the background. As you know, this bill was already tabled several times in the House. Twice in the past the Royal Recommendation was requested for it and both times, the House Speaker decided to refuse it.

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Patricia Kell