Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-20 of 20
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Government Operations committee  As you just said, there are a large number of motions. But they have been put in a certain order. That is why, on Thursday, we are going to look at the federal government's real estate plan, with Ms. Michèle Demers, from the Professional Institute of the Public Service, as a witn

February 12th, 2008Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee

Government Operations committee  No, it was not the one about Gomery, it was Mr. Holland's

February 12th, 2008Committee meeting

The Clerk

Government Operations committee  The January 25 motion was passed at meeting 9, a week ago.

February 7th, 2008Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee

Government Operations committee  There has been some discussion lately about the sub judice aspect of things, and there is no fixed decision on that. The usual provision would be to be careful, but some scholars would propose that the rule does not restrict members from getting into those matters with some cau

February 5th, 2008Committee meeting

The Clerk

Government Operations committee  If it is agreeable to Mr. Angus, instead of adding something on the subamendment we would take off what is already in the first motion. In English it would read: That this committee look into whether the unprecedented decision taken by the former Treasury Board President during

February 5th, 2008Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee