Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 91-97 of 97
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Canadian Heritage committee  No, we did not. We thought if they're going to fund one side, they should fund our side. We didn't think it was fair at all, but we wanted to show, by our application, that this was a discriminatory organization. Certainly, the documentation and all the letters we had back, which

December 11th, 2006Committee meeting

Gwendolyn Landolt

Canadian Heritage committee  It depends on how it's interpreted, obviously, and you only get one side arguing for it—

December 11th, 2006Committee meeting

Gwendolyn Landolt

Canadian Heritage committee  It can't be answered. Are you still beating your husband? It's the same kind of question.

December 11th, 2006Committee meeting

Gwendolyn Landolt

Canadian Heritage committee  I believe it depends on how it's interpreted. That's my only response. I can't say it's perfect, because it depends on how they interpret the very vague words.

December 11th, 2006Committee meeting

Gwendolyn Landolt

December 11th, 2006Committee meeting

Gwendolyn Landolt

Canadian Heritage committee  Yes, thank you, Mr. Chairman. But you have a conflict of interest. For example, the current executive director of the National Association of Women and the Law is a former executive director of the court challenges program. They're all intertwined and interlocked, administering

December 11th, 2006Committee meeting

Gwendolyn Landolt

Canadian Heritage committee  Thank you, Mr. Chairman. It's our pleasure to be here. REAL Women has been involved with the court challenges problem, or I would say uninvolved, because we have been excluded totally from it. We have tried for years to get some sort of funding and some sort of recognition. Beca

December 11th, 2006Committee meeting

Gwendolyn Landolt