Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 104
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Status of Women committee  I'm not really sure I understand the context of your question.

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

John Farrell

Status of Women committee  Let me address a couple of issues. I hear all the time in these discussions that you cannot bargain away human rights. First of all, we employers understand and believe that pay equity is a fundamental human right, and what we're trying to sort out is the appropriate way to get

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

John Farrell

Status of Women committee  Employers don't disagree with a proactive approach; in fact, we support it. In a nutshell, employers believe it's important to identify gaps where they exist, identify the reasons for the gaps, and develop a plan to close the gap. Understanding why the gap exists is most importan

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

John Farrell

Status of Women committee  Pay equity is a human right and pay equity is also part of the bargaining process. We can't change the labour laws that exist in this country. We have to operate within the confines of those laws. An employer cannot change the terms and working conditions of unionized employees w

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

John Farrell

Status of Women committee  I could comment, if you wish.

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

John Farrell

Status of Women committee  Yes, I am, thank you.

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

John Farrell

Status of Women committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. My name is John Farrell. I'm the executive director of Federally Regulated Employers - Transportation and Communications. Joining me today as an adviser on pay equity matters is Ms. Barbara Gagné, manager of labour relations and classification at Nav Cana

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

John Farrell

Status of Women committee  Yes. Another very important point in the ability to manage pay equity is the determination of the term “establishment” or “pay equity unit”. We believe that the most appropriate unit for determining pay equity is the bargaining unit, as determined in the certification under the

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

John Farrell

Human Resources committee  The current employment insurance provisions have a qualifying period of 52 weeks. The way it is set up, you have to be gainfully employed during those 52 weeks and making contributions to the fund. If you're able to engage in a labour dispute and extend your entitlement for a l

April 26th, 2010Committee meeting

John Farrell

April 26th, 2010Committee meeting

John Farrell

Human Resources committee  Fundamentally, yes.

April 26th, 2010Committee meeting

John Farrell

Human Resources committee  I think that's a fair comment. I think that, in a labour relations sense, stability is quite important. The ability of employers in the federal jurisdiction to work with the Canadian Labour Congress to hammer out the way the Canada Labour Code operates or the way in which employm

April 26th, 2010Committee meeting

John Farrell

Human Resources committee  --or unions.

April 26th, 2010Committee meeting

John Farrell

Human Resources committee  Fundamentally, very few labour disputes end up in strikes or lockouts. Let's put it this way: I think that the record in Canada has been getting better and better over the last 10 years. For the most part, in all jurisdictions, employers, employees, and unions are finding better

April 26th, 2010Committee meeting

John Farrell

Human Resources committee  Yes, I would say that this bill does shift some of the risk to the employer.

April 26th, 2010Committee meeting

John Farrell