Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-4 of 4

Finance committee  I'll try to do that. As you say, money doesn't grow on trees, but the more money you accumulate—whatever its form—in a plan, the more money there will be at retirement. The important thing is to have good protection mechanisms to ensure that the risk is well shared between all those who contribute.

May 7th, 2009Committee meeting

Madam Nathalie Joncas

Finance committee  The Canadian system has three pillars: the Old Age Security pension, the QPP, the CPP and corporate plans. This isn't a bad system. Currently, the weak pillar is corporate plans, which do not cover 40%—and less than 40%—of the labour force. We could always increase the second pillar, the Canada Pension Plan or Quebec Pension Plan, as some people have suggested, but that would cause other problems.

May 7th, 2009Committee meeting

Madam Nathalie Joncas

Finance committee  Yes, indeed, in the best times, we need to increase reserves, thus to increase this 10%, because we realized that 10% was not enough during periods such as those we've experienced. It's good for the plans in place, but I believe you have to go further to try to find other models.

May 7th, 2009Committee meeting

Madam Nathalie Joncas

Finance committee  Good morning. Under the legislation governing the provincial plans, in Quebec and Ontario, if a company closes and is nevertheless in good financial shape, but the plan is deficient, meaning the fund is in a deficit position, that becomes a debt of the business, which must cover the amounts promised.

May 7th, 2009Committee meeting

Madam Nathalie Joncas