Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Public Safety committee Obviously, the advice we give to our ministers is protected by solicitor-client privilege. As my colleague has indicated, we do a robust charter analysis of all draft legislation, including motions. I can't give you an answer to that without violating solicitor-client privilege.
May 4th, 2023Committee meeting
Paula Clarke
Public Safety committee Do you mean that it's gone through the approval process?
May 4th, 2023Committee meeting
Paula Clarke
Public Safety committee Whenever we draft legislation, we provide our ministers and decision-makers with a full suite of analyses, from a policy perspective and all relevant legal aspects.
May 4th, 2023Committee meeting
Paula Clarke
Public Safety committee That's correct.
May 4th, 2023Committee meeting
Paula Clarke
Public Safety committee There's nothing in the amendment that changes the current law around antique firearms.
May 4th, 2023Committee meeting
Paula Clarke
Public Safety committee I'm sorry. Your question is....
May 4th, 2023Committee meeting
Paula Clarke
Public Safety committee In the proposed amendment, if these were actually regulated firearms.... If they had a velocity over 152.4 metres per second and a muzzle velocity in excess of 5.7, then they would be regulated firearms. If you had a replica of a regulated firearm, then it would be prohibited.
May 4th, 2023Committee meeting
Paula Clarke
Public Safety committee That's in order to be captured. If your example does not meet the definition of a regulated firearm, then it would not be a replica.
May 4th, 2023Committee meeting
Paula Clarke
Public Safety committee That would be the threshold.
May 4th, 2023Committee meeting
Paula Clarke
Public Safety committee Hi. I just want to recap to make sure we're on the same page. Your example is a new firearm that is designed in the future and produced in the future, which is capable of—
May 4th, 2023Committee meeting
Paula Clarke
Public Safety committee Okay. I can speak to the law, and maybe Ms. Paquette can jump in if I'm making a mistake. The way the definition is drafted is that it's meant to capture any firearm that is capable of receiving a magazine that can hold more than the legal limit, so in this case it would be six
May 4th, 2023Committee meeting
Paula Clarke
Public Safety committee I don't have the technical expertise to answer that question. I would defer to the CFP for that.
May 4th, 2023Committee meeting
Paula Clarke
Public Safety committee That's correct.
May 2nd, 2023Committee meeting
Paula Clarke
Public Safety committee I would just remind the committee that the evergreen definition and schedule 2 would come into force by an order in council and, during that time, the Canadian firearms program would have an opportunity to review the firearms reference table to identify which firearms may be capt
December 8th, 2022Committee meeting
Paula Clarke
Public Safety committee It has been prepared. It is being vetted through our approval process to be able to forward it to the committee.
December 8th, 2022Committee meeting
Paula Clarke