Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 176
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Procedure and House Affairs committee  No, I don't have it here with me.

March 18th, 2011Committee meeting

Margaret Biggs

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Sorry, Chair, I am trying to answer the question.

March 18th, 2011Committee meeting

Margaret Biggs

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Chair and member, I don't actually know the exact number of proposals that the agency receives every year. With respect to Canadian non-governmental organizations, there are over 500 or 600 in Canada with whom CIDA has had a relationship. So that would be a base number for this p

March 18th, 2011Committee meeting

Margaret Biggs

Procedure and House Affairs committee  As I've said previously, my recommendation to the minister on this issue before us was clear. The decision from the minister back to the department on this issue was also clear.

March 18th, 2011Committee meeting

Margaret Biggs

Procedure and House Affairs committee  It's important, as the deputy, to make sure that I understand what the minister's decision was. The best practice—and I think the minister would agree to this—would be to have ”do not agree” written below the signature line. That would be clearer. However, the minister's decision

March 18th, 2011Committee meeting

Margaret Biggs

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Chair, as the deputy head, what's important from an accountability point of view is that the analysis and advice coming from the department to the minister is clear and that it goes to the minister. Secondly, it's important that the decision and the direction from the minister

March 18th, 2011Committee meeting

Margaret Biggs

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Mr. Chair, I don't think my opinions are what matters—

March 18th, 2011Committee meeting

Margaret Biggs

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I can speak to my own understanding, which was that the minister's decision to me was quite clear, sir.

March 18th, 2011Committee meeting

Margaret Biggs

Procedure and House Affairs committee  The minister's decision was very clear to me and to my department.

March 18th, 2011Committee meeting

Margaret Biggs

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Chair, as I stated on December 9 at the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, it was quite normal for recommendations to go to a minister and for a negative decision to be returned to the department. That was understood to be consistent with the practice of government. The sec

March 18th, 2011Committee meeting

Margaret Biggs

March 18th, 2011Committee meeting

Margaret Biggs

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Once the minister makes a decision, it is the decision of the agency, yes.

March 18th, 2011Committee meeting

Margaret Biggs

Official Languages committee  We had a very interesting meeting with Graham Fraser at the clerk's deputy ministers' weekly meeting. The issue of official languages was also discussed at the public service advisory committee and the Public Service Commission advisory committee. It is something that's also take

February 17th, 2011Committee meeting

Margaret Biggs

Official Languages committee  Do you mean their minutes?

February 17th, 2011Committee meeting

Margaret Biggs

Official Languages committee  I'm not sure, actually; I don't know that there are minutes. There are certainly not minutes taken at deputy ministers' breakfasts. Are you asking whether they are reported out in both official languages?

February 17th, 2011Committee meeting

Margaret Biggs