Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 121-129 of 129
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Industry committee  We carefully considered that question. In the context of the committee, there was talk, concerning the Do not call list, of a 31-day time frame to respond to that request. We made a minor change. As you can see, the bill now refers to 10 working days. The idea was to grant 10 day

October 7th, 2009Committee meeting

André Leduc

Industry committee  It's not for that at all.

October 7th, 2009Committee meeting

André Leduc

Industry committee  No. The jurisdictional scope of the legislation is for communications sent to Canadians or to Canada, sent from Canada, or routed through Canadian networks.

October 7th, 2009Committee meeting

André Leduc

October 7th, 2009Committee meeting

André Leduc

Industry committee  I guess it gets to the point of the legislation, which is how one would define what is malicious and what is not malicious. Basically, the idea behind this piece of legislation is that it is a compliant regime, designed to encourage compliance with the rules set out in the legisl

October 7th, 2009Committee meeting

André Leduc

Industry committee  Well, we did our homework in terms of direct marketing, and we spoke to our colleagues in New Zealand and Australia when we were developing the legislation. In fact, most of the definitional aspects of the legislation were taken directly from the Australian and New Zealand models

October 7th, 2009Committee meeting

André Leduc

Industry committee  We're heading down the street of having specific definitions for express consent and implied consent, and trying to create a model for implied consent under the existing business relationship and the existing non-business relationship and the other factors we've set out here, par

October 7th, 2009Committee meeting

André Leduc

Industry committee  Which section are you looking at?

October 7th, 2009Committee meeting

André Leduc

Industry committee  Philip might be better able to provide the rationale for this. The one under subclause 8(2) is just a technical amendment to clarify that the person is in Canada when they give the directions.

October 7th, 2009Committee meeting

André Leduc