Subcommittee on International Human Rights committee  Sure. I could speak a little bit on timelines. I think it's very difficult to come up with any timeline that's very accurate, which is why, as Mr. McLaren says, there's a lot of disagreement. In effect, people use a timeline depending on the exact question they ask. Ultimately, for Iran to pose a nuclear threat to Israel or to any other country, it would probably have to do three things.

Subcommittee on International Human Rights committee  Certainly when it comes to the discussions of the P-5 plus one and the current Pentagonal talks, as they're called, we've made it clear to our friends in there that we're willing to participate, but they're the ones who are setting the parameters. We can't exactly force ourselves into these talks.

Subcommittee on International Human Rights committee  I'm sorry; I misunderstood the first part, about which report you were speaking of.

Subcommittee on International Human Rights committee  I think we've always been supportive of dialogue with Iran on this. As Mr. McLaren said, one of the areas we are still in discussion with the Iranians on, under the controlled or limited engagement policy, is the nuclear file. We don't have any direct talks with Iran right now on the nuclear issue because we have deferred to our allies, who have under way a process--I'm sure you're familiar with it--known as the P-5 plus one.