Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 61-75 of 86
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Human Resources committee  Well, it puts a responsibility on the Correctional Service that it does not have now--

November 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Dominique La Salle

Human Resources committee  --in terms of collecting some information and providing it to us. I think there will be a dialogue between Service Canada and the inmate. For example, an inmate who turns 65 while in custody can apply for the benefit and go through the eligibility. That takes a period of time. T

November 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Dominique La Salle

Human Resources committee  The information sharing agreement will have service standards that must be met. That will be the agreement between the two departments, where they have to meet timelines, etc.

November 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Dominique La Salle

Human Resources committee  Which amendment do you mean?

November 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Dominique La Salle

Human Resources committee  It makes it more restrictive, in our view.

November 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Dominique La Salle

Human Resources committee  The language that is used now allows before or after, and the amendments here would make it before. There may be cases when information, for some reason, is not available. We're focusing now on information on release dates. But the information that is most salient for preparing

November 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Dominique La Salle

Human Resources committee  I would simply say that it is the responsibility of all Canadians to apply for benefits under the program. On our side, it is our duty to check the information and to issue payment as quickly as possible. This is all part of a move towards accountability, but it is assisted accou

November 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Dominique La Salle

November 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Dominique La Salle

Human Resources committee  First of all, the amendment is directed at the federal government, not the provinces. Secondly, we believe that the present neutral language provides greater flexibility regarding the timing of the provision of information. There is nothing that can fall between the cracks since

November 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Dominique La Salle

November 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Dominique La Salle

Human Resources committee  If I may, I will ask my colleague to deal with the privacy and other issues that this may raise.

November 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Dominique La Salle

Human Resources committee  I think so, yes.

November 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Dominique La Salle

Human Resources committee  That's correct.

November 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Dominique La Salle

Human Resources committee  I understand the aim of the amendment, clearly, and I think the legislation does it well with the current language.

November 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Dominique La Salle

Human Resources committee  That is indeed the case. Correctional Services has no jurisdiction over provincial prison facilities and so on, so this will be a subject of a separate information sharing agreement. It does exclude the province. The amendment proposed would be only for application at the federal

November 2nd, 2010Committee meeting

Dominique La Salle