Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Procedure and House Affairs committee That's correct.
November 26th, 2009Committee meeting
John Hollins
Procedure and House Affairs committee Completely neutral.
November 26th, 2009Committee meeting
John Hollins
Procedure and House Affairs committee Yes. The political entity stayed away from it per se.
November 26th, 2009Committee meeting
John Hollins
Procedure and House Affairs committee No, I was not.
November 26th, 2009Committee meeting
John Hollins
Procedure and House Affairs committee I'm really of mixed opinions on this for a couple of reasons. Yes, it obviously saves money if that's the purpose, and of course you would do that. Does it cloud the issue? In my experience, I would suggest it did. There were two horses in the race fighting all the way along--the
November 26th, 2009Committee meeting
John Hollins
Procedure and House Affairs committee The decision was clear: it was 63% one way and 37% the other. Would the 111,000, if they had been included on either side of that, have made a difference? They would not whatsoever. To me, the 111,000 suggests that not everybody was there to vote for the referendum. They just cle
November 26th, 2009Committee meeting
John Hollins
Procedure and House Affairs committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Chair, committee members, and other members of the public, thank you very much for the invitation to appear before your committee today. As mentioned, my name is John Leslie Hollins. I was the Chief Electoral Officer for the Province of Ontario from 200
November 26th, 2009Committee meeting
John Hollins